军人应对方式量表的常模及结果分析

The Making of the National Norm of Military Personnel Coping Style

目的:建立军人应对方式量表常模。方法:在全军分层随机抽取15380名军人,进行应对方式的测量,检测结果采用因素分析、相关分析、方差分析和t检验等。结果:(1)该量表在军人团体中各分量表的同质性信度为0．62～0．80,分半信度为0．53～0．79,重测信度为0．66～0．78之间;六个因素累计贡献率为58．29％;解决问题、自责、求助、幻想、退避及合理化的因素负荷依次为0．32～0．56、0．38～0．68、0.31～0．68、0．30～0．47、0．26～0．55和0．28～0．59;(2)在大部分应对方式因子上存在显著的级别差异和性别×军龄交互作用效应;(3)不同级别军人在解决问题、求助、合理化因子上有显著差异(P<0．01); (4)不同军龄的男性军人在解决问题、自责、求助、幻想、退避及合理化因子上都有显著差异(P<0．01); (5)不同军龄的女性军人在解决问题、求助、退避及合理化因子上有显著性差异(P<0．01)。结论:应对方式量表在军人群体中有较好的信、效度,建立的常模有助于军人心理健康教育和心理素质训练。

Objective： To found national coping style norm for military personnel by means of the Coping Style Scale （CSS） . Methods： A test with CSS was carried out on 15380 military personnel stratified randomly sampled military personnel all over the country, and the result was analyzed by Factor Analysis, Correlation Analysis, Variance Analysis and T Analysis. Results： ①The measure indexes of this scale in military personnel were ： Cronbach α of the six part-scale was 0. 62-0. 80, plit-half reliable was 0. 53 - 0. 79, test-retest reliability was 0. 66 - 0. 78, and the cumulative of the six factors was up to 58. 29 % ; The factor loading of each factor was 0. 32 -0. 56, 0. 38 - 0.68, 0. 31 - 0. 68, 0. 30 - 0. 47, 0. 26 - 0. 55 and 0. 28 - 0. 59 ; ②An MANOVA showed that on most factors of the CSS, both the main rank effect and the interaction between gender and military ages were significant; ③Resolving problem, appeal and rationalization were different on rank significantly （ P 〈 0.01 ） ; ④Resolving problem, remorse, appeal, fantasy, retreat and rationalization were different on male/military ages significantly （ P 〈 0.01 ） ; ⑤Resolving problem, appeal, retreat and rationalization were different on female/military ages significantly （P 〈 0.01 ） . Conclusion： CSS has good reliability and validity in the army, the national norm is avail for military personnel mental healthy education and mental quality training.