期刊文献+

沉默的大多数:差序格局与环境抗争 被引量:154

The Silent Majority:Chaxu Geju and Environmental Action in Urban China
原文传递
导出
摘要 2003年全国综合社会调查显示,城镇居民在遭受环境危害后,只有38.29%的人进行过抗争,高达61.71%的人选择了沉默。对这一现象的研究发现,一个人社会经济地位越高、社会关系网络规模越大或势力越强、关系网络的疏通能力越强,对环境危害作出抗争的可能性就越高,反之则选择沉默的可能性越高。据此可以认为,中国城镇居民面对环境危害时的行为反应深受差序格局的影响;在遭受环境危害后之所以有抗争或沉默的行为差异,是由于在差序格局下,不同社会经济地位的人通过社会关系网络所能支配和调用的资源不同。 In China GSS 2003 conducted in urban area, when confronted with the reported environmental hazards, only 38.29% of the respondents acted up to protest, while 61.71% kept silent, taking no action at all. Moreover, it is found that the higher one's socio-economic status, larger one's network size and more potent one's network influence, the more possibly one took actions. This article attests that the variation of action or inaction, is the function of chaxu geju (approximately means "differential mode of association"), a China-characteristic particularism, under which, people with differential socio-economic status can count differentially on one's own network to gather the resources for envi- ronmental action.
作者 冯仕政
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期122-132,共11页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金(200108) 项目主持人为洪大用教授。
关键词 差序格局 环境抗争 社会经济地位 社会关系网络 社会资本 社会治理 chaxu geju environmental action socio-economic status social network social capital
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Inglehart, Ronald. The Silent Revolution : Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics [M].Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1977;Inglehart, Ronald. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society[M]. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press, 1990.
  • 2阎云祥.礼物的流动:一个中国村庄中的互惠原则与社会网络[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000.132,144—169.
  • 3Walder, Andrew G. Communist Neo-Traditionalism :Work and Authority in Chinese Industry[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1986.
  • 4Bian, Yanjie. Guanxi and the Allocation of Urban Jobs in China[J]. China Quarterly, 1994, (140) : 971- 999 ;Bian, Yanjie, Ronald L Breiger, Deborah Davis, and Joseph Galaskiewicz. Occupation, Class and Social Networks in Urban China[J]. Social Forces, 2005, (83) :1443- 1468;Pieke, Frank N. Bureaucracy, Friends, and Money: The Growth ofCapital Socialism in China[J]. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1995, (37) : 494- 518.
  • 5Portes, Alejandro. Social Capital. Its Origins and Applications in Modem Sociology[J]. Annual Review of So-ciology, 1998, (24) : 1- 24.
  • 6Putnam, Robert D. , Robert Leonardi, and Raffaella Nanetti. Making Democracy Work : Civic Traditions in Modern Italy [M]. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press, 1993.
  • 7Portes, Alejandro. Social Capital. Its Origins and Applications in Modem Sociology[J]. Annual Review ofSociology, 1998, (24):1- 24 ; Portes, Alejandro and Julia Sensenbrenner. Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on theSocial Determinants of Economic Action[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1993, (98) : 1320- 1350.
  • 8Levi, Margaret. Social and Unsocial Capital:A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work[J]. Politics and Society, 1996,24 (1) : 45- 55.

同被引文献2680

引证文献154

二级引证文献1442

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部