期刊文献+

安邦河湿地浮游植物及营养现状评价 被引量:14

Phytoplankton and Trophic Levels in Anbang River Wetland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 于2005年7月至2006年5月对安邦河湿地浮游植物进行调查,通过浮游植物结合综合营养状态指数法对其营养现状进行评价。调查共发现浮游植物8门104种,以绿藻最多(49种),其次蓝藻(25种)、硅藻(18种)。营养指示种结果表明处于中营养化水平。浮游植物年平均数量为182.44×10^4ind·L^-1,生物量为2.92mg·L^-1。各站位的数量显示安邦河湿地处于中、富营养化水平,而生物量表现为中营养化水平(除8#、10#站位外)。生物量以硅藻占优(年平均占40.75%),为硅藻型,属中营养化水平。基于生物量的Shannon-Veaner指数评价结果显示,除了春季的3#、4#、6#、8#和秋季的4#站位是贫营养外(〉3.30),其他均为中营养化水平(0.93—3.30),说明安邦河湿地整体已处于中营养化水平。各季节各站位的综合营养状态指数均在30~50之间,均为中营养化状态,支持了浮游植物评价结果。由此可见,安邦河湿地处于中营养状态,有向富营养化过渡的趋势,通过监测浮游植物可以正确评价其水质状况。 An investigation was carried out in Anbang River wetland, a type of high frigid swamp, from July 2005 to May 2006. Phytoplankton diversity of 104 taxa, belonging to Chlorophyta (49), Cyanophyta (25), Baeillariophyta (18), Chrysophyta (4), Euglenophyta (3), Xanthophyta (2), Cryphophyta (2), and Pyrrophyta (1), were found. There were 17 eutrophic taxa, 34 mesotrophic taxa and 25 oligotrophie species were indentifiod in the studied period. Typical trophie indicators, such as Aphanizomenon flos- quae, Microcystis aeruginosa, Melosira granulate, and so on, which are usually associated with eutrophic environments, were monitored and were the dominant species in 1 #, 5 #, 9 # sampling stations, with ratios of 51.31% , 58.28% , and 53.37% , respectively. Trophie taxa showed that the trophie status of Anbang river wetland was mesotrophers. Total mean abundance was 183.32 × 10^4 ind · L^-1 and biomass was 2.92 mg· L^-1 , respectively, with an order of temporal distribution of abundance and biomass summer 〉 autumn 〉 spring. The abundance of sampling stations were from 42. 12 × 10^4 ind · L^- 1 to 178.53 × 10^4 ind · L^-1 in spring, at 98.04× 10^4-396.57 × 10^4 ind · L^-1 in summer, and at 58.45 × 10^4 -323.93 × 10^4ind · L^-1 in autumn, biomass in spring from 1.21 mg · L^-1 to 3.02 mg · L^-1 , in summer at 2.57-4.80 mg· L^-1, and in autumn at 1.34-4.35 mg·L^-1. Based on the criteria of trophie status in phytoplankton in China: (1) abundance 〈3 × 10^5 ind · L^-1 or biomass at 1-1.5 mg · L^-1 is oligotropher; (2) abundance at 3 × 10^5-10 × 10^5 ind · L^-1 or biomass at 1.5-5 mg · L^-1 is mesotrophers; (3) abundance 〉 10 × 10^5 ind · L^-1 or biomass 〉 5 mg · L^-1 is eutropher. There was differentia in trophie status based on the abundance and biomass. Results of abundance showed it was mesotrophers & eutropher, but biomass was mesotrophers except 8# and 10# sampling stations. Biomass of Bacillariophyta was dominant in spring (62.16%), autumn (41.30%), and mean (40.75%), only in summer was non-dominant species (27.59%), merely 〈 Chlorophyta (33.95%) , revealed the phytoplankton community was Baeillariophyta type, was mesotrophers. Diversity index is a useable method in evaluating water trophic starus. Species number, Margalef' s index, Shannon-Veaner' s index and Pielou' s index were collected. Correlation analysis between the species number and Margalef's index in Anbang River wetland indicated that had a positively significant correlation (Spearman r = 0. 988, n = 30, P 〈 0. 001 ), Shannon-Veaner, s index had a positively significant correlation with Pielou' s index ( Spearman r = 0.875, n = 30, P 〈 0. 001 ), there was no significant correlation between other diversity indexes (P 〉 0.05, n = 30). Therefore, Margalef' s index and Shannon-Veaner's index were collected to measure phytoplankton community diversity. However, Margalef's index is strongly correlate to rare species, and the results maybe error, in contrast, Shannon-Veaner's index is one of best diversity index, which can be preferably reflect the phytoplankton community structure. Shannon-Veaner's index indicated that in spring there were 9, in summer 4, and in autumn 8 sampling stations, which value 〉 3.30, showed most of sampling stations were oligotrophic water, not same as the indicator species and biomass estimation, based on abundance. Shannon-Veaner's index based on biomass suggested that 3#, 4#, 6#, 8# in spring, and 4# in autumn 〉3.30, were oligotrophic, other between 0.93 and 3.30, were mesotrophers, sustained results of indicator species and biomass evaluation. Phytoplankton compositions are affected by different environmental factors such as nutrient, pH, light, temperature, and so on, so trophic status should be monitored by vary methods. Trophic level indexes (TLI) based on chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and secchidisk depth (SD) were conducted, TLI between 30 and 50 in all sampling stations in three seasons, and 5#, 9# sampling stations in summer, which TLI were 49. 459 and 49. 731, nearly the eutrophic status. TLI demonstrated that water in Anbang river wetland was mesotrphic, were likely to maintain the results of phytoplankton. In summary, water quality was well, belonging to mesotrophic, but had the potential to eutrophication. Though water trophic status assessment based on phytoplankton may seem clear enough, it served as a valuable example for the future monitoring of the Anbang River wetland water quality.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第B03期288-296,共9页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 国家科技部农业科技成果转化基金项目(04EFN217100394) 黑龙江省科技攻关项目(GC04B520)
关键词 浮游植物 营养状态 安邦河湿地 phytoplankton trophic status Anbang River wetland
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Froneman P W.Food web dynamics in a temperate temporarily open/ closed estuary (South Africa)[J].Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science,2004,59:87-95.
  • 2Pham N N,Huismanb J,Sommeijera B P.Simulation of three-dimensional phytoplankton dynamics:competition in light-limited environments[J].Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2005,174:57-77.
  • 3李纯厚,林钦,张汉华,蔡文贵,黄洪辉,戴明.大亚湾大鹏澳网箱养殖水域的浮游植物生态特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2005,24(4):784-789. 被引量:7
  • 4Rey P A,Taylor J C,Laas A,et al.Determining the possible application value of diatoms as indicators of general water quality:a comparison with SASS 5[J].Water SA,2004,30:325-332.
  • 5Ferreira J G,Wolff W J,Simas T C,et al.Does biodiversity of estuarine phytoplankton depend on hydrology?[J].Ecological Modelling,2005,187:513-523.
  • 6Pedro C,Emilio M,Valesca P,et al.Phytoplankton size structure and primary production in a highly dynamic coastal ecosystem (Ri'a de Vigo,NW-Spain):seasonal and short-time scale variability[J].Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science,2006,67:251 -266.
  • 7Hillebrand H,Drselen C D,Kirschtel D,et al.Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae[J].Journal of Phycology,1999,35:403-424.
  • 8孙军,刘东艳,魏皓,钱树本.琉球群岛邻近海域浮游植物多样性的模糊综合评判[J].海洋与湖沼,2001,32(4):445-453. 被引量:57
  • 9辛晓云.河南南湾水库浮游硅藻的种群结构与水质污染评价初步研究[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):125-126. 被引量:26
  • 10况琪军,胡征宇,周广杰,叶麟,蔡庆华.香溪河流域浮游植物调查与水质评价[J].武汉植物学研究,2004,22(6):507-513. 被引量:113

二级参考文献117

共引文献1501

同被引文献169

引证文献14

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部