期刊文献+

认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)的信效度研究 被引量:264

Reliability and Validity of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Chinese Version
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估认知情绪调节问卷中文版本(CERQ-C)的信效度及其在中国大学生中的使用。方法:用CERQ-C对523个大学生施测。一个月以后从原样本中随机抽取100个样本重测。结果:全量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.81,9个分量表的α系数在0.48到0.91之间;全量表的重测信度为0.56,9个分量表的重测信度在0.36到0.69之间;全量表的条目间平均相关系数为0.10,9个分量表的条目间平均相关系数在0.19到0.71之间,验证性因子分析各指标:CFI(0.981),IFI(0.981),TLI(0.977),RMSEA(0.062)均符合测量学要求,支持量表九因素模型的理论构想。结论:CERQ-C具有合适的信度和效度,是评估情绪调节认知策略的可靠工具。 Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-C). Methods: The CERQ-C was administrated to 523 university students, and one month later, the CERQ-C was randomly readministered to a subset of the original sample (n=100). Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.81 and for the nine subscales ranged from 0.48 to 0.91 ;The mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the CERQ-C was 0.10, and the mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the nine subscale ranged from 0.19 to 0.71.The test-retest reliability coefficient for the total scale was 0.65 and for the nine subscales ranged from0.36to 0.69; Indices of confirmatory factor analysis such as CFI (0.981)IFI (0.981 )TLI (0.977)RMSEA (0.062)all meet the standard of psychometrics and supported the original CERQ-C structural hypothesis of nine factors model. Conclusion: The CERQ-C is a reliable and valid assessment of cognitive emotion regulation strategies.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2007年第2期121-124,131,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 中南大学文理研究基金资助(项目号:0601012)
关键词 认知情绪调节 信度 效度 Cognitive emotion regulation Cognitive coping Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Thompson RA.Emotion regulation:A theme in search of definition.In N.A.Fox,The development of emotion regulation:biological and behavioral considerations.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,59,Serial No.240).I.Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,1994.25-52
  • 2Lazarus RS,Folkman S.Transactional theory and research on emotion and coping,European Journal of Personality,1978,1:141-1692
  • 3Folkman S,Lazarus RS.Appraisal,coping,health status,and psychological symptoms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,50:571-579
  • 4Endler NS,Parker JDA.Multidimensional assessment of coping:a critical evaluation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,58:844-854
  • 5Endler NS,Parker JDA.Assessment of multidimensional coping:task,emotion and avoidance strategies,Psychological Assement,1994,6:50-60
  • 6Carver CS,Scheier MF,Weintraub JK.Assessing coping strategies:A theoretically based approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,56:267-283
  • 7Compas BE,Connor-Smith JK,Saltzman H,et al.Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence:Problems,progress,and potential in theory and research.Psychol.Bull,2001,127:87-127
  • 8Mandler G.Constructivisit theory of emotion.In:L Stein,B Leventhal,and T Trabasso.Psychological and biological approaches to emotion.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1990.21-43
  • 9Garnefski N,Kraaij V,Spinhoven Ph.Negative life events,cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems.Personality and Individual Differences,2001,30:1311-1327
  • 10Garnefski N,Teerds J,Kraaij V,Legerstee J,et al.Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms:Differences between males and females.Personality and Individual Differences,2004,36:267-276

同被引文献2408

引证文献264

二级引证文献1713

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部