摘要
中国农村正规金融供给严重不足,促进了农村自发金融创新。农户资金互助合作社,就是这种创新的典型案例。基于一定社区或村组的、限于成员间不断借贷的资金互助,不同于世界范围内普遍存在的以轮转储蓄信贷协会(RoSCA)形式存在的互助会,是一种重复博弈。在满足成员的小额贷款需求方面的绩效显著,并有财务上可持续发展的能力。但是,它资金实力有限,并在股权设置等方面需要完善,最重要的是政府应该制定相应的法律法规,促进其更加规范化发展。
Formal financial services in rural areas in China are obviously insufficient, which results in self-financial innovation. Rural mutual financial cooperative (RMFC) is a typical case of those innovations. It's based on community, village and membership and differs from the ubiquitous Rotary Savings Credit Association (RoSCA). RoSCA indicates a one time game, but RMFC shows a repeated game. RMFC has achieved outstanding performance in satisfying its members' demand for small loan and fostered financial sustainability. However, its financial strength should be increased unceasingly and its shareholding system should be improved gradually. Especially, correspondent laws and regulations should be formulated by the government so as to accelerate its normalized development.
出处
《金融理论与实践》
北大核心
2007年第4期3-8,共6页
Financial Theory and Practice
基金
福特基金课题"社区合作金融组织
农户金融需求与收入"的阶段性研究成果之一
关键词
资金互助合作社
业务绩效
制度绩效
小额贷款
rural mutual financial cooperative
business performance
institutional performance
small loan