期刊文献+

当代中国立法的道德考量 被引量:2

Moral Considerations of Lawmaking in Contemporary China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在现代民主法治社会中,立法难免对性道德问题进行回应。在理解道德立法方面,我们可以从西方自由主义政治哲学的有关论述中得到启发。在论证道德立法的正当性问题上,结合美国联邦最高法院在性道德领域内的判例,我们将道德纳入立法的表现形式归纳为社会秩序、公共道德和社会环境。我国目前正处于一个道德回归和社会价值观重建的时期,立法无法避免要对性道德问题进行回应。我们一方面应当谨慎对待立法的道德化,防止立法对私人道德的过度干预;另一方面需要发扬民族传统道德,发挥公共道德对社会价值整合的力量。 In modern democratic legal system country, lawmaking might not avoid responding to sexual moral issues. In the terms of understanding the moral lawmaking, we may learn enlightment from western liberal political philosophers" theories. As to the justifications for moral lawmaking, drawing lessons from the United States" Supreme Court cases of sexual moral, moral might be ab- sorbed into lawmaking by three types, social order, public moral and social environment. Today, facing a return of moral and social values reorganization, legislation can not avoid responding to moral. On the one hand, we should carefully respond to moral lawmaking and prevent legislative intervening excessly in private morality. On the other hand, we should carry forward the traditional moral and exert public moral power of renovating social values.
作者 马存利
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期134-142,共9页 Law and Social Development
关键词 道德立法 同性恋 伤害原则 崩溃论 自由主义 moral lawmaking gays harm principle theory of slippery slope liberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1章文君.李银河:换妻行为无道德问题聚众淫乱罪过时[EB/OL].http://news. 163. com/06/1025/13/2U9JFFPF0001.1229. html, 2006-10-25.
  • 2[英]约翰·密尔.论自由[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.
  • 3马克思恩格斯全集:第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
  • 4Stanley Kurtz. Beyond Gay Marriage [J/OL]. http: //www. weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/938xpsxy. asp, 2003-08-04.
  • 5John Finnis. Law, Morality, and "Sexual Orientation" [J]. Notre Dame L. Rev , 1994, (69) .
  • 6John Finnis. Natural Law and Natural Rights [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
  • 7Ronald Dworkin. Liberalism, A Matter of Principle, Cambridge [M]. Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1985.
  • 8[美]丹尼尔·贝尔.社群主义及其批评者[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2002.
  • 9Joseph Raz. The Morality of Freedom [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
  • 10Joseph Raz. Autonomy, Toleration, and the Harm Principle, in Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: the In fluence of H. L. A. Hart [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

共引文献376

同被引文献62

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部