期刊文献+

认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好 被引量:68

Need for Cognitive Closure,Framing Effect and Decision Preference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在带有模糊性的决策情境中,决策者个人的认知特征会对其判断决策产生重要影响。通过实验的方法,考察了认知闭合需要和特征框架效应对个体决策偏好的影响。93名工商管理硕士(MBA)参与了实验,研究的结果支持了研究的3个假设,即认知闭合需要与特征框架效应不仅对被试的决策偏好存在显著的影响,而且二者还存在显著的交互作用。具体来说,研究发现,在模糊情境中:高认知闭合需要的被试偏好于立刻做出决策,而低认知闭合需要的被试偏好于暂缓做出决策;接收到正向框架信息的被试偏好于立刻做出决策,而接收到负向框架信息的被试偏好于暂缓做出决策;认知闭合需要与特征框架对被试的决策偏好还存在显著的交互作用。研究结论为根据个体认知闭合需要的水平来选拔决策者、利用框架效应来影响个体的信息加工方式进而提高决策质量提供了理论依据。 Individuals often use heuristics to make decisions. As heuristic-based judgments are likely to create bias, it is useful to investigate who tend to use more heuristics in their judgments. Lay epistemic theory in social cognitive psychology has asserted that, individuals with high dispositional need for cognitive closure (NFCC) prefer to make instant decisions under uncertain situations. Based on this theory and related research findings, we hypothesized that people with high dispositional NFCC would use more heuristics in making decisions and prefer an instant judgment. We also predicted that negative framing would make people process information in a more systematic way, leading individuals to defer their choices instead of making immediate judgments under ambiguous situations. To investigate the influence of need for cognitive closure and attribute framing on individuals' decision preference, a 2 (high vs. low NFCC)^* 2 (positive vs. negative attribute framing) between-subject design was adopted. Ninety three MBA students were asked to complete the NFCC scale. Four weeks later, they were asked to participate in a decision making experiment. Each participant was presented with two decision scenarios. After reading each scenario, each was required to indicate the extent of their decision preference-making an immediate decision or deferring the decision. The results showed that, individuals with high NFCC preferred to make decisions immediately whereas those with low NFCC preferred to postpone decisions. Moreover, individuals made immediate decisions when information was positively framed and deferred decisions when information was negatively framed. In addition, NFCC and attribute framing have an interactive effect on decision preference.This study is among the very few studies that investigate the impact of NFCC on decision preference and thus contributes to the framing effect literature by showing that people with high dispositional NFCC are not affected by the framing effect. These findings have significant managerial implications. First, individuals' chronic NFCC can serve as a useful criterion in selecting decision makers in organizations. Second, negative framing of decision information can help individuals to search more information before they make a decision, which improve decision quality.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期611-618,共8页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 上海财经大学"211"新进人员启动基金项目
关键词 认知闭合需要 特征框架效应 决策偏好. need for cognitive closure, attribute framing, decision preference.
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Friedman M, Price Theory, Chicago: Aldine, 1976
  • 2Simon H A. Rationality as process and product of though. American Economic Review, 1978, 68:1 - 16
  • 3Stigter G J, The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 1961,3:213-225
  • 4Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185:1124 - 1131
  • 5Bazerman M H, Judgment in managerial decision making. 5th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002
  • 6Hammond J S, Keeney R L, Raiffa H. The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, 1998, Sep/Oct: 47 -58
  • 7张文慧,张志学,刘雪峰.决策者的认知特征对决策过程及企业战略选择的影响[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):373-381. 被引量:55
  • 8Kruglanski A W. Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases. New York: Plenum, 1989
  • 9Webster D M, Kruglanski A W. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67:1049 - 1062
  • 10De Dreu C K W, Koole S L, Oldersma F L. On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25:348-362

二级参考文献31

  • 1Wang X T,Cognition,1996年,60卷,31页
  • 2Wang X T,Ethol Sociobiol,1996年,17卷,1页
  • 3Wang X T,Organ Behav Human Decis Process,1996年,68卷,2期,145页
  • 4Miles R E, Snow C C. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw - Hill, New York, 1978.
  • 5White S, Linden G. Organizational and industrial response to market liberalization: The interaction of pace, incentive and capacity tochange. Organization Studies, 2002, 23:917-948.
  • 6Chu P C, Spires E E. Perceptions of accuracy and effort of decision strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003, 91 : 202 -214.
  • 7Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management Review,1984. 9:195-206.
  • 8Finkelstein S, Hambrick D. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. New York: West, 1996.
  • 9Bartunek J M, Gordon J R, Weathersby R P. Developing "complicated " understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8 : 273-284.
  • 10Duys D K, Hedstrom S M. Basic counselor skills training and counselor cognitive complexity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 2000, 40:8-18.

共引文献83

同被引文献953

引证文献68

二级引证文献343

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部