摘要
我国民法典是否应设立债法总则?侵权行为法是否应从债法体系中分立出去?这是当前民法典编纂所讨论的重大问题之一。本文从法典编纂的作业要求、法典编纂的理论背景、各国或地区的民法典关于债法内容安排的通例以及债的一般规范对侵权行为的可适用性等方面,阐述了民法典应设立债法总则以统帅各种具体债,维护债法体系完整性的观点。本文还对主张侵权法独立的理由做了比较深入的剖析,认为这些理由不足以构成侵权法从债法中分立的理由。
Weather should we set the general part of obligation law in our country's Civil Code or not? Weather should we separate the torts law from the law of obligation or not? These problems are the important issues which have been discussed in the codification of Civil Code by now. According to the requirements and the theory background of the operation of ~cation, the general practice of the contents of the obligation law in every country or district and application of the general rule of obligation to the torts law, our Civil Code should set the general part of obligation law which governs all kinds of concrete obligations. Thus the completeness of the system of obligation law will be maintained. Moreover, the further analysis of the reasons on the independence of the torts law proves that the torts law should not be separated from the law of obligation.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期3-12,共10页
China Legal Science
基金
中国政法大学2005年度人文社科规划项目"民法典债法体系研究"的阶段性成果