摘要
目的:比较腹针与传统针刺治疗颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:将62例颈型或神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为腹针组(观察组)32例,穴取中脘、关元等;传统针刺组(对照组)30例,穴取风池、颈夹脊等。以简化McGill疼痛询问量表(MPQ)及临床疗效为客观指标,比较两组第1次治疗后、疗程结束和3个月随访的疗效差异。结果:观察组有效率为100.0%,对照组为100.0%,两组比较,差异无显著性意义。两组治疗后和随访MPQ各项指标均较治疗前明显改善,观察组第1次治疗后与治疗前的疼痛分级指数(PRI)感觉分差值和第1次后、总疗程后和3个月随访与治疗前的PRI总分差值均较对照组明显改善(P<0.05)。结论:腹针能较好地缓解颈椎病患者的疼痛感觉,且有即时的缓解疼痛效果,但尚不能说其疗效优于传统针刺。
Objective To compare clinical therapeutic effects of abdominal acupuncture and traditional acupuncture on cervical spondylosis (CS). Methods Sixty-two cases of neck or nerve-root type CS were randomly divided into an observation group (n= 32) treated by abdominal acupuncture at Zhongwan (CV 12), Guanyuan (CV 4) and others, and a control group (n= 30) treated by traditional acupuncture at Fengchi (GB 20) and cervical Jiaji (EX-B 2), etc.. Simplified McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and clinical therapeutic effects were served as the objective indexes. Their clinical therapeutic effects were compared after the first session of treatment, at the end of therapeutic course and 3 months after the end of treatment. Results The two groups had a same effective rate of 100.0%. All items of MPQ in these two groups after treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment significantly improved, and in the observation group the differences in the PRI feeling score before and after the first treatment, and the difference of the total PRI scores after the first treatment, at the end of therapeutic course and 3 months after the end of treatment significantly improved as compared with the control group (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Abdominal acupuncture can better reduce the pain of the patient caused by CS, with transient pain-alleviating effect, but whether or not the clinical therapeutic effect of abdominal acupuncture is better than the traditional acupuncture still can not be proved.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第9期652-656,共5页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词
颈椎病/针灸疗法
随机对照试验
穴位
胸腹部
@腹针
Cervical Spondylosis/am ther, Randomized Controlled Trial
Points, Chest & Abdomen
@ Abdominal Acupuncture