期刊文献+

印度的公益诉讼制度 被引量:14

Public Interest Litigation System in India
原文传递
导出
摘要 印度公益诉讼发端于20世纪70年代末,以司法能动主义理论为基础,在世界范围内首次将原告资格拓宽到了每一个公民,并且创立了书信管辖权制度、调查委员会制度等,以保证公益诉讼判决的实施。公益诉讼制度实施二十几年来,在创建责任政府、保护公民基本权利以及环境保护等方面都取得了显著的成就。鉴于印度和中国各方面的相似性,其制度对我国具有重要的借鉴意义。 The public interest litigation of India began at the late 1970s, which took judicial activism as its theory foundation. During its implementation, the judges of the Supreme Court established the epistolary jurisdiction and the commission of inquiry in order to make sure that the ju th dgments were executed. And the most important thing is, every citizen can sue as locus standing in e public interest litigation in India and it is for the first time that the locus standing is enlarged to everybody around the world. After the executing the public interest litigation for more than twenty years, India gains great improvement environment protection. And the public in government responsibili interest litigation of India ty, human rights protection and is of important meaning to China because of the similarity of the two countries.
作者 何兵 王轩
出处 《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 2007年第3期131-138,共8页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金 司法部研究项目"公益行政诉讼研究"(编号021447)的成果之一
关键词 印度 公益诉讼 司法能动主义 India Public Interest Litigation Judicial Activism
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Dr. Parvez Hassan, Azim Azfar, Securing Environmental Rights Through Public Interest Law in South Asia, Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 2004.
  • 2Upendra Baxi, Taking Suffering Seriously:Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court Of India, The Role of the Judiciary in Plural Societies, Frances Printer, London, 1987, P20.
  • 3Arun Ray Mohapatra, Public Interest Litigation and Human Rights In India, published by RADHA PUBLICATIONS 2001, P71.
  • 4《印度宪法》第226条.
  • 5宪法精品课程网. http://61.145.119.78:8082/show.aspx?id=343Acid=31.
  • 6Arun Ray Mohapatra, Public Interest Litigation and Human Rights In India, published by RADHA PUBLICATIONS 2001, P128.
  • 7Ashok H. Desai and S. Muralidhar, Public Interest Litigation:Potential and Problems, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000, P159.
  • 8克里斯托弗·沃尔夫《司法能动主义-自由的保障还是安全的威胁》.黄金荣译.中国政法大学出版社,2004年版.
  • 9姜玉梅,孟虹.印度司法审查制度评述[J].南亚研究季刊,2004(3):68-71. 被引量:5
  • 10S. P. Sathe ,Judicial Activism:The Indian Experience ,Washington University Journal of Law & Policy ,2001.

共引文献4

同被引文献301

引证文献14

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部