期刊文献+

教育政策研究:议论批判的视域 被引量:58

Policy Studies in Education:Discursive-Critical Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文旨在对政策研究、特别是教育政策研究的新近发展,加以评论及综合。有关的发展被部分政策研究者称之为阐释转向、争辩转向或说服转向,这些转向基本上是对自二十世纪六十年代起主导政策研究的一种"经验—技术"视域的回应。本文把这些变化统称为"议论批判"视域,它总结了多个理论视域近年在政策研究中的贡献。它们包括:文本、文本质感及文本互联性的诠释学研究,议论的考古学及系谱学研究,批判政策研究。这些转向将会把政策研究从以往只属于政府官员与政策研究者私下的对话引领至一个更为民主的批判议论的平台。 The aim of this article is to review the recent developments in the field of policy studies in general and that of policy studies in education in particular.These developments have been char- aeterized by various practitioners in the field as interpretive,argumentative or persuasive turns. These turns basically signify the reactions to the empirical-technical perspective,which has domina- ted the field since the 1960s.These recent developments have been characterized in this article as discourse-critical perspective.It summarized the methodological contributions to policy studies put forth by hermeneutic studies of text,textaulity and intextuality;archaeological and genealogical studies of discourse;and critical policy studies.It is expected that this emerging perspective will lead the field away from the private dialogues between government officials and policy analysts to a more democratic arena of critical discourse.
作者 曾荣光
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 北大核心 2007年第4期2-30,共29页 Peking University Education Review
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献99

  • 1Lasswell, H.D. (1980). Harold D. Lasswell on Political Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 2Lasswell, H.D. (1951). "Policy Orientation. " in D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (Eds.) The Policy Sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press,10.
  • 3deleon, P. ( 1988 ). Advice and consent: The development of the policy sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • 4Yanow, D. ( 2000 ). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oak : Sage Publications, 17.
  • 5Easton, D. ( 1953 ). The political system, an inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Knopf, 129.
  • 6Ball, S.J. ( 1990 ). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. London: Routledge,3.
  • 7Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books. ( Original work published in 1969) ,27, 117,32,41,42,122,55,50-52,56-59,64,165,234.
  • 8Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy : Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford : Oxford University Press,87,90-91.
  • 9Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press ,37-61,102,207-215.
  • 10Ball, S.J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham : Open University Press, 15,11.

二级参考文献38

  • 1程凤春.教育质量特性的表现形式和内容——教育质量内涵新解[J].教育研究,2005,26(2):45-49. 被引量:48
  • 2(香港)教育署.学校管理新措施:改善香港中小学教育质素的机制[R].香港:香港政府印务局,1991:9,10,33—35,6.
  • 3(香港)教育统筹委员.教育统筹委员会第七号报告书:优质学校教育[R].香港:香港政府印务局,1997:3—4,17.
  • 4Harry Braverman. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.
  • 5S.J. Ball. Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. D. Gleeson. & C. usbands. The Performing School: Managing, Teaching,and Learning in a Performance Culture. London: Routledge/Falmer, 2001: 210-226.
  • 6Michel Foucault. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane, 1977.
  • 7Max Weber. Economy and Society: An Outline of lnterpretive Sociology, vol. 1. New York:Bedminster Press. Chapter 3. 1968.
  • 8Michel Foucault. The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
  • 9Ulrich. Beck. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992.
  • 10Zygmunt. Bauman. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000: 31-32.

共引文献37

同被引文献782

引证文献58

二级引证文献388

;
使用帮助 返回顶部