自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较

A Comparison between the Chinese Version of Ego-Resiliency Scale and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

目的:考察自我韧性量表中文版的心理测量学指标,探讨其与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的关系,比较两者在中国人群中的应用效果。方法:在社区人群中施测自我韧性量表和Connor-Davidson韧性量表的中文版,以及自尊量表、生活满意度指数A问卷、大五人格问卷。结果:自我韧性量表中文版的内部一致性系数为0.77,略低于Connor-Davidson韧性量表。自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的相关系数为0.61。在以自尊、生活满意度、大五人格为效标时,偏相关分析表明控制了Connor-Davidson韧性量表得分后,自我韧性量表与效标的相关未达到显著水平(除大五人格的外向性维度外);但控制了自我韧性量表得分后,Connor-Davidson量表与效标的相关仍达到显著水平(除开放性维度外)。结论:在我国人群的应用中,Connor-Davidson韧性量表优于自我韧性量表,是值得推广的韧性测量工具。

To investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of Ego-Resiliency Scale, its relationship with Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and their applications to Chinese people, the Ego-Resiliency Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, Life Satisfaction Index A, and NEO-Five Factor Inventory were administered to community people. The results indicated that the internal consistent coefficient of Ego-Resiliency Scale was 0.77, which is lower than that of Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. The correlation coefficient between Ego- Resiliency Scale and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was 0.61. When validated against self-esteem, life satisfaction, and the five-factor model of personality, Ego-Resiliency Scale was not significantly correlated with these validating indicators （except for the E of the five-factor model of personality） after the control over the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in partial correlation. However, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was still significantly correlated with the validating indicators （except for the O personality） after the control over Ego-Resiliency Scale. Our conclusion is that Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale is more effective than Ego-Resiliency Scale in application to Chinese people; Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale is a valuable instrument to measure resilience.