期刊文献+

组织信任氛围对任务绩效的作用途径 被引量:102

The Mechanism of How Trust Climate Impacts on Individual Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过问卷调查与结构方程建模分析组织信任对于员工工作绩效的影响途径。203名被试和他们的上司参与了问卷调查。结果分析采用潜变量路径分析方法。我们构建多组模型与构思模型,通过两个阶段的检验,分析了组织信任的作用机制。结果表明:组织信任作用于心理安全感,而心理安全感通过两条独立途径影响工作绩效,分别是工作聚焦与工作改进。心理安全感能够促进员工针对工作的不断改进的行为和探索新工作方法的意愿,同时也有利于员工集中精力在工作上,从而提高个人工作业绩。 This paper explored the mechanism through which trust climate influences on individual performance. From the scope of psychological dynamics, we investigated the relationship among perception of organizational climate, motivation and individual behaviors to crystallize how a trustworthy organizational environment favors superior individual performance. The primary aim of this paper is to examine the idea that trust climate enhances levels of psychological safety, which has two independent ways to impact on task performance. First, psychological safety diminishes apprehension about the potential negative consequences of innovative or learning behaviors (enhance the possibility of spontaneous innovation), such as failure or exposure of lack in knowledge or expertise. Second, psychological safety keeps employees from distracters (increase the ability to focus), such as organizational politics, which occupy great amount of employee's time and energy. With more available resource that could be allocated to behaviors benefiting organization productivity, individuals are likely to have better performance. The two paths are hypothesized to be mutually complementary, and each of them accounts for different mechanisms through which trust climate facilitates superior individual oerformance. Data were obtained from 203 full - time employees of three companies in the eastern China. To avoid the effect of common method bias, we collected employee's psychological states data and their performance information separately (performance data were rated by employee's direct leader). Considering the susceptibility of trust research to social desirability, we employed Aryee's sampling procedure (2002) that is regarded as an effective solution to diminish negative outcome of social desirability. The statistical package of LISREL 8.45 was used to examine the hypotheses. The procedure of testing mediator proposed by Baron & Kendy (1980) was followed to scrutinize the relations between variables. In the first stage of data analysis, we tested the hypothesis whether psychological safety mediates the relationship between trust climate and individual performance. In order to provide a stringent examination of our hypotheses, two alternative nested models were established and compared with the hypothesized model. It was revealed that effect of trust climate on task performance is mediated by psychological safety. In the second stage of data analysis, we examined the mediating role of spontaneous innovation and ability to focus in the process that psychological safety translates into performance. Following the same logic employed in the first stage, seven nested alternative models were constructed for comparisons. Results supported the mediating effect of spontaneous innovation and ability to focus, and it also indicated the existence of other potential way(s) that psychological safety impacts on performance, beyond the two paths examined in this article. Finally, the theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
作者 李宁 严进
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期1111-1121,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70301011)
关键词 组织信任 信任氛围 心理安全 工作专注 改进创新 任务绩效 trust in organization, trust climate, psychological safety, ability to focus, spontaneous innovation,task performance.
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1Kramer R M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 1999, 50:569 -598
  • 2Ferrin D L, Dirk K T, Shah P. Many routes toward trust: a social network analysis of the determinants of interpersonal trus. Best Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, 2003
  • 3Gillespie N A, Mann L. Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2004, 19(6): 588 -607
  • 4Hampden - Tume C, Trompenaars F. Building Intercultural Competence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000
  • 5Harvey S, KeUoway E K, Duncan - Leiper L. Trust in management as a buffer of the relationships between overload and strain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2003, 8(4): 306 -315
  • 6Kim P H, Ferrin D L, Cooper C D, Dirks K T. Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence - versus integrity - based trust violations Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(1): 104 - 118
  • 7李宁,严进,金鸣轩.组织内信任对任务绩效的影响效应[J].心理学报,2006,38(5):770-777. 被引量:64
  • 8Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burt R S, Camerer C. Not so different after all: a cross - discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 393 -404
  • 9Tan H H, Tan C S. Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 2000, 126(2): 241 -260
  • 10Wong Y T, Wong C S, Ngo H Y. Loyalty to supervisor and trust in supervisor of workers in Chinese joint ventures: a test of two competing models. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2002, 13(6): 883 -900

二级参考文献32

  • 1Morgan D E,Zeffane R.Employee involvement,organizaional change and trust in management.International journal of human resource management,2003,14(1):55~75
  • 2Davis J,Schoorman F D,Mayer R,Tan,H.Trusted unit manager and business unit performance:Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage.Strategic Management,2000,21 (1):563~576
  • 3Mayer R C,Gavin M B.Trust in management and performance:Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal,2005,48:874~88
  • 4McAllister D.Affect-based and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations.Academy of Management Journal,1995,38:24~59
  • 5Kramer R M.Trust and distrust in organizations:emerging perspectives,enduring questions.Annual Review of Psychology,1999,50:569~98
  • 6Aryee S,Budhwar P S,Chen Z X.Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes:test of a social exchange model.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2002,23:267~85
  • 7Tan H H,Tan C S F.Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization.Genetic,Social and General Psychology Monographs,2000,126:241~60
  • 8Dirks K T,Ferrin D L.The role of trust in organizational settings.Organization Science,2001,12:450~67
  • 9Payne R L,Clark M C.Dispositional and situational determinants of trust in two types of managers.International Journal of Human Resource Management,2003,14:128 ~38
  • 10Atuahene-Gima K,Li H.When does trust matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States.Journal of Marketing,2002,66:61~81

共引文献63

同被引文献1447

引证文献102

二级引证文献762

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部