期刊文献+

科技人员薪酬满意与公平关系的实证研究--基于江苏省13地市调研数据的结构方程模型分析 被引量:19

Empirical research on the relationship between pay satisfaction and fairness of science and technology personnel——SEM analysis based on the survey data of thirteen cities in Jiangsu province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 薪酬满意度对科技人员的工作积极性和科研绩效有着重要影响,并进而影响到创新型国家的建设。公平是影响薪酬满意度的重要因素。本文在文献回顾的基础上,将科技人员薪酬满意感分解为工资收入满意感、保障福利满意感和组织成就满意感三个方面,并将公平感分解为比较公平感和制度公平感两方面,然后采用结构方程模型方法对江苏省13地市大样本(共发放问卷15800份)调研数据进行了实证研究,验证了公平感是科技人员薪酬满意感的重要影响因素假设,而且发现工资收入满意感和保障福利满意感受比较公平感的影响较大,制度公平感对组织成就满意感影响较大。在结论分析中提出了相应的政策建议。 Pay satisfaction has an important impact on the work activity and scientific research performance of the science and technology personnel and fairness is the important factor to pay satisfaction. Based on the former studies, pay satisfaction is divided into salary satisfaction, welfare satisfaction and achievement satisfaction, and fairness is divided into compared fairness and institutional fairness. Using the method of SEM, this paper gave an empirical research on the survey data of thirteen cities in Jiangsu province. Finally, this paper gave some specific recommendations which would be helpful to improve the pay satisfaction of science and technology personnel during the analysis of the empirical research results.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期378-384,共7页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 中国科协软科学项目(2006DCYJ09) 国家自然科学基金项目(70440010)
关键词 科技人员 薪酬满意感 公平 结构方程模型 实证研究 science and technology personnel pay satisfaction fairness SEM empirical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献91

  • 1徐联仓.组织行为学在中国之发展与领导行为研究[J].心理学报,1986,18(4):343-348. 被引量:15
  • 2王重鸣,陈民科.管理胜任力特征分析:结构方程模型检验[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):513-516. 被引量:514
  • 3Isaac, Joe E. Performance-related pay: the importance of fairness [J]. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 2001, 43(2) : 111-123.
  • 4Summers, Timothy P and William H Hendrix. Modeling the role of pay equity perceptions: a field study [J]. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1991, 64(2) : 145- 157.
  • 5Heneman, Herbert G Ⅲ, and Timothy A Judge. Compensation attitudes [A]. In: Rynes, Sara L, and Barry Gerhart,(eds.). Compensation in organizations: current research and practice [C]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000: 61-103.
  • 6Adams, J Staey. Inequity in social exchange [A]. In: Berkowitz Lenard (eds.). Advance in experimental social psychology [C]. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1965.
  • 7Dornstein, Miriam. The fairness judgments of received pay and their determinants[J]. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1989, 62(4): 287-299.
  • 8Leventhal, Gerald S. What should be done with equity theory? new approaches to study of fairness in social relationships[A]. In.. Gergen, Kenneth J, Martin B Greenberg, and Richard H Wills (eds.). Social exchange., advance in theory and research [C]. New York, NY: Plenum, 1980: 27-55.
  • 9Wallace, Marc J, and Charles H Fay. Compensation theory and practice [M]. Boston, Mass: Kent Publishing Co. ,1988.
  • 10Bies, Robert J, and Joseph S Moag. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness [A]. In: Lewicki, Roy J,Blair H Sheppard, and Max H Bazerman (eds.). Research on negotiations in organizations[C]. Greenwich, CT:JAI,1986: 43-55.

共引文献471

同被引文献214

引证文献19

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部