期刊文献+

庭审交际中法官对信息流动的控制 被引量:14

A Study on Judges’ Manipulation of Information Flow in Courtroom Interaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法庭审理过程以信息的处理和使用为中心,在处理和使用中,信息的发展和传递形成信息流动。在庭审交际中,法官具有法律赋予的最高权力,可以并且应该对信息的流动加以控制,以便使案件的审理顺利、有序地进行。法官对信息流动的控制有一定规律。本文对法官在控制信息流动过程中的作用和规律进行研究,为法官在庭审中合理地处理信息且有效地运用语言提供理论上的参照。 The focus of courtroom trials is information processing and utilization. The development and transmission of information constitute information flow. In courtroom interaction, judges have the most authoritative power endowed by law and can and should manipulate the flow of information so as to facilitate the steady and orderly progress of the trials. judges' manipulation has certain features. This paper seeks to reveal such features and the role judges play in manipulating information flow, which can hopefully provide judges with a reference for handling information and using language.
作者 杜金榜
出处 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2008年第2期36-40,共5页 Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
基金 教育部社科基金重大项目阶段性成果(06JJD740006) 广东省哲学社会科(05K-04)资助 广东外语外贸大学科研创新团队项目(GW2006-TB-006)资助
关键词 信息流动 控制 庭审 信息点 流向 information flow, manioulation, courtroom trial, information knot, direction of flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Chafe,W.L.Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow[A].In Russells S.Tomlin (ed.),Coherence and Grounding in Discourse.Amsterdam:Benjamins.1987.
  • 2[2]Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].London:Edward Arnold & Co.1985.
  • 3[3]Labor,W.Therapeutic Discourse[M].New York:Academic Press Inc.1977.
  • 4杜金榜.法律语篇树状信息结构研究[J].现代外语,2007,30(1):40-50. 被引量:66
  • 5[5]Mann,W.& Thompson,S.Relational propositions in discourse[J].Discourse Processes 1986.9.57-90.
  • 6[6]Taboada,M.Building Coherence and Cohesion:Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish[M].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins.2004.
  • 7[7]Candilis,P,Martinez,R & Dording,C:Principles and narrative in forensic psychiatry:toward a robust view of professional role[J].JAm Acad Psychiatry Law 2001.29:167-173
  • 8[8]Weinstock R:A broadened conception of forensic psychiatric ethics[J].J Am Academy Psychiatry Law 2001.29:180-185
  • 9[9]Harris,S.Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers:Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials[J].Discourse Studies,2001,3,1,Feb,53-74.2001.
  • 10[10]Gibbons,J.Forensic Linguistics:An Introduction to Language in the Justice System[M].Blackwell Publishing Ltd.2003.

二级参考文献29

  • 1贾学勤,陈忠华.语篇信息度的认知分析[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):10-13. 被引量:8
  • 2刘云红.话语信息及其分类[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2005,28(3):9-13. 被引量:4
  • 3彭宣维.语篇主题链系统[J].外语研究,2005,22(4):6-13. 被引量:21
  • 4安利.语篇的信息类型[J].外语学刊,2006(1):68-72. 被引量:16
  • 5Beyssade, C. & J. Marandin. 2002. Topic marking, discourse topic and discourse moves [A]. Presented at the Workshop on Information Structure in Context. University of Stuttgart, Germany, Nov. 15-16, 2002.
  • 6Braddock, R. 1958. An extension of the Lasswell Formula [J]. Journal of Communication 8: 88-93.
  • 7Brown, G. & G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Biiring, D. 1999. Focus and topic in a complex model of discourse [A]. In G. Krifka & van der Sandt (eds.). Focus and Presupposition in a Multi-speaker Discourse [C]. ESSLI-99 Workshop Reader.
  • 9Biiring, D. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents [J]. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511-545.
  • 10Callow, K. 1998. Man and Message: A Guide to Meaning-Based Text Analysis [M]. New York: University Press of America.

共引文献65

同被引文献256

引证文献14

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部