期刊文献+

基于农户视角的江汉平原农村饮水安全支付意愿的实证分析--以石首市个案为例 被引量:24

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文应用条件价值评估法调查了湖北省石首市农户对获得安全饮水的支付意愿,并通过Logistic回归模型对农户支付意愿的影响因素进行了分析。研究结果表明:农户对农村饮水安全的支付意愿较高,71.5%的农户表示愿意支付,平均支付金额为121.94元。影响农户支付意愿的因素主要有户主年龄、家庭人口数量和户主文化程度。根据农村饮水的公共物品特征,本文认为,必须明确农户的支付领域,而政府的介入是确保农村饮水安全的关键。
出处 《中国农村观察》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期20-28,共9页 China Rural Survey
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究项目“城乡一体化进程中的空间结构与村镇布局研究”(05JDZH232) 国家自然科学基金项目“江汉平原乡村住区系统演变与人居环境优化研究”(40671050)的支持
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Hanemann, W, M.: Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, Vol 8:19-43.
  • 2Schuman & Presser.Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys.New York:Academic Press, 1981.
  • 3Wilson,A.R.Contingent Valuation:Not an Appropriate Valuation Tool.The Appraisal Journal (Winter2006) :53-61.
  • 4Loomis,J. B & Walsh, R.G :Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs (2nd) . Venture Publishing Inc, 1997.
  • 5Cooper, J. & Loomis,J.:Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models. Land Economics, 1992,68 (2) :211-214.
  • 6Bennett ,J.; Morrison,M and Blamey,R.:The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1998, 42 (2) :131-148.
  • 7Hanemann,W.M.:Some Issues in Continuous-and Discrete-Response Contingent Valuation Studies. Northeast J. Agr. Econ. (1985) :5-13.
  • 8Richard, C.T.; Hanernann,W.M. and Mitchell,R.C.:Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices. Dep. Econ. Work. Pap, University of California, San Diego, 1986.
  • 9Hanemann, M;Loomis, J. and Kanninen,B.:Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, Amer J. Agric. Econ, 1991: 1255-1263.
  • 10Flachaire, E. & Hollard,G. Controlling Starting-Point Bias in Double-Bounded Contingent Valuation Surveys.and Economics, 2006,82 (1) :103-111.

二级参考文献17

  • 1National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation[J].Federal Register,1993,58(10):4601-4614.
  • 2Bateman I J,Langford I H,Turner R T,et al.Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J].Ecological Economics,1995,12:161-179.
  • 3宁夏回族自治区环境保护局.2001,2002年宁夏水族自治区环境状况公报[Z].,2001,2002..
  • 4Hanemann M.Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses[J].Am.J. of Agric.Econ.,1984,67(3):332-341.
  • 5Hanemann M,Loomis J, Kanninen B.Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1991,73:1255-1263.
  • 6Sam Kayaga,John Calvent,Kevin Sansom.Paying for water services:effects of households characteristics[J].Utilities Policy,2003,11:123-132.
  • 7密云县人民政府.《密云县生态示范区建设总体规划》[Z].,2002年..
  • 8D.V. Raje, P.S. Dhobe, A.W. Deshpande: Consumer's Willingness to Pay More for Municipal Supplied Water: A Case study, Ecological Economics, 2002(42).
  • 9杜桂森,孟繁艳,李学东,张为华,王建厅,武殿伟.密云水库水质现状及发展趋势[J].环境科学,1999,20(2):110-112. 被引量:93
  • 10李莹,白墨,杨开忠,王学军.居民为改善北京市大气环境质量的支付意愿研究[J].城市环境与城市生态,2001,14(5):6-8. 被引量:55

共引文献111

同被引文献312

引证文献24

二级引证文献304

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部