期刊文献+

中国1987~2006年金融体系脆弱性的判断与测度 被引量:107

An Empirical Assessment of China's Financial Fragility in 1987-2006
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于金融系统性风险状况的判断,一直是研究的难点和热点。本文在前人研究的基础上,利用动态因子分析的方法,构建了季度的金融脆弱性指数,对我国1987—2006年的金融系统脆弱性进行评估与判断,并对主要风险来源和演变过程给出分析。主要得到如下几点结论:一、在过去二十年中,约有20%的时间是极度脆弱的,主要表现在1994年以前。二、金融脆弱性总体呈现下降趋势,但在1999—2002年表现出上升趋势。三、不同风险演变路径不同。1987—2006二十年里,流动性风险是主要风险来源,但其呈显著下降趋势,而信贷风险和市场风险并没有下降趋势,相反自2005年开始呈现不断上升的态势。这些结论也与定性分析的结果相一致。 The assessment of financial fragility has always been a hot topic not only in academia but also in government institutions. However, it is also difficult to obtain an accurate and scientific result. Based on the previous research, the paper constructs a quarterly financial fragility index by using dynamic factor analysis method, and applies it with China's data from 1987 to 2006. The main findings can be summarized into three points. Firstly, China's financial system was assessed as extremely fragile at approximately twenty percent of the period in the past twenty yeas before 1994. Secondly, the general financial risk presented a decreasing tendency based on the whole sample period while an obvious increasing tendency during 1999 - 2002. Finally, different risk has different pattern. From 1987 to 2006, financial risk was mainly sourced from liquidity risk, but it decreased notablely, and credit risk and market risk have been increasing since the first quarter of 2005. These conclusions are consistent with the points of qualitative analysis.
作者 万晓莉
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期80-93,共14页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 2007国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目的支持
关键词 金融脆弱性 量化测度 因子分析 financial fragility, empirical assessment, dynamic factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1刘卫江.中国银行体系脆弱性问题的实证研究[J].管理世界,2002,18(7):3-10. 被引量:49
  • 2蒋丽丽,伍志文.资本外逃与金融稳定:基于中国的实证检验[J].财经研究,2006,32(3):93-102. 被引量:18
  • 3孙立坚,李安心,牛晓梦.金融体系的脆弱性不会影响经济增长吗?--来自对中国实证分析的答案[OL].http://www.ifsfd.org/focus/more.
  • 4沈中华 谢孟芬.事件风险:以货币危机及银行危机为例.企银季刊,1999,(3).
  • 5沈中华 谢孟芬.资本流入与银行脆弱性—跨国比较[J].Journal of Financial Studies(台湾),2000,(3):1-40.
  • 6Allen, F. and D. Gale. Financial Fragility[ R] , Working Paper No. 01 - 37, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, University of Pennsylvania. Available at http ://fic. wharton. upenn. edtt/fic/papers/01/0137.pdf.
  • 7Artis, M., Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M. Factor forecasts for the UK[ R]. EUI Florence.mimeo, 2005.
  • 8Aykut Kibritcioglu. Excessive risk - taking, banking sector fragility, and banking crises [ R ]. NBER Working Paper Series 266 July, 2002.
  • 9Bai,J. and S. Ng. Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models [ J]. Econometrica, 2002 (70) : 191 -221.
  • 10Bernanke, B.S. and M. Gertler. Financial Fragility and Economic Performance [ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1990, 105(1) : 87 -114.

二级参考文献14

  • 1贺力平,张艳花.资本外逃损害经济增长吗?——对1982年以来中国数据的检验及初步解释[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):66-74. 被引量:17
  • 2Calvo G, Leiderrnan L, C Reinhart. The capital inflows problem: Concepts and issues[J]. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1994,12:55-66.
  • 3Detragiache, Enrica. Bank fragility and international capital mobility[R]. IMF Working Paper 1999.
  • 4Goldfajn Ilan,Rodrigo O Valdes. Capital flows and the Twin Crises. The role of liquidity[R]. IMF Working Paper 1997.
  • 5Gondlez-Hermosllo, Pazarba sioglu, Billings. Determinants of banking system fragility:A case study of Mexico[R]. IMF Staff Papers, 1997,3: 295-314.
  • 6Aykut Kibritcioglu. Excessive risk-taking, banking sector fragility, and banking crises[R]. NBER Working Paper Series 266 July,2002.
  • 7孙立坚,李安心,牛晓梦.金融体系的脆弱性不会影响经济增长吗?——来自对中国实证分析的答案[0L].http://www.ifsfd.org/focus/more.
  • 8Qinglai Meng, Andres Velasco. Can capital mobility be destabilizing? [R]. NBER Working Paper 7263, July 1999.
  • 9沈中华 谢孟芬.事件风险:以货币危机及银行危机为例.企银季刊,1999,(3).
  • 10胡祖六.东亚的银行体系与金融危机[J].国际经济评论,1998(5):13-17. 被引量:46

共引文献65

同被引文献1101

引证文献107

二级引证文献625

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部