期刊文献+

女性性生活质量问卷的编制和信效度检验 被引量:65

Development of Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire for Women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制适用于我国女性的性生活质量测评工具,并检验其信效度。方法:采用文献回顾、个人访谈、专家评定等方法形成初始问卷,先对366名已婚女性的测试结果进行探索性因子分析,再对1529名已婚女性的测试结果进行验证性因子分析,同时还进行了信度分析、效标效度分析。结果:探索性因子分析得到32个题项,形成六个因子,可解释总方差的63.59%;六个因子依次为性满意度、性交流、性焦虑、性反应、性态度、性体像,因子载荷范围在0.488~0.818之间;验证性因子分析验证了六因子模型,其结果为χ^2/df=5.247、GFI=0.905、NFI=0.906、TLI=0.914、CFI=0.922、RMSEA=0.053;总的Cronbachα系数为0.937,重测信度为0.925;总量表评分与O lson婚姻质量问卷性生活分量表有较高的相关性(r=0.716,P〈0.01)。结论:女性性生活质量问卷具有较好的信度和效度。 Objective: To develop sexual quality of life questionnaire for women.Methods:Literature review,personal interview and qualitative study were used to develop initial questionnaire.Then the initial questionnaire was administered to 366 married women for exploratory factor analysis,and to 1529 married women for confirmatory factor analysis.To evaluate the reliability and validity,correlation analysis was also used.Results: After exploratory factor analysis,a questionnaire consisted of 32 items was established,which had six factors: satisfaction,communication,anxiety,sexual response,attitude and self-image.These six factors could explain 63.59% of the total variance and were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis(χ^2/df=5.247;GFI=0.905;NFI=0.906;TLI=0.914;CFI=0.922;RMSEA=0.053).Cronbach coefficient was 0.937,test-retest reliability was 0.925.The correlation coefficient between the total score of the questionnaire and subscale score of Olson's Marital Inventory(sexual relationship) was high(r=0.716,P〈0.01).Conclusion: Sexual quality of life questionnaire for women has good reliability and validity.
作者 胡蕾 胡佩诚
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期447-450,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家“985工程”二期(985-2-027-39)
关键词 性生活质量 心理测量学研究 女性 信度 效度 sexual quality of life women reliability validity psychometric studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Schober JM. Sexual quality of life in an intersexual population: a needs assessment. BJU Int, 2004, (Suppl 3): 54 - 56.
  • 2Wagner TH, Patrick DL, McKenna SP, et al. Crosscuhural development of a quality of life measure for men with erection difficulties, Qual Life Res , 1996, 5:443 -449.
  • 3Woodward JMB, Hass SL, Woodward PJ. Reliability and validity of the sexual life quality questionnaire (SLQQ). Quality of Life Research , 2002, 11 : 365 - 377.
  • 4Symonds T. Sexual quality of life questionnaire for use in men with erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. International Journal of Impotence Research, 2002, 14 ( Suppl. 4),S29.
  • 5Symonds T, Boolell M, Quirk F. Development of a Questionnaire on Sexual Quality of Life in Women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 2005, 31:385 - 397.
  • 6Greenber JS, Bruess CE, Haffner DW. Exploring the Dimensions of Human Sexuality. Jones and Bartlett Publishers. 1999.
  • 7Spitzer WO. State of science 1986: Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1987,40:465-471.
  • 8李凌江,张亚林,杨德森,郝伟,肖水源,李振国,廖巨福,吴舸,罗友根,黄俊,张斌,刘解宁.社区人群生活质量研究──Ⅱ方法学及社区人群的总体生活质量[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(4):186-190. 被引量:219
  • 9Olson DH. Prepare-Enrich: Counselor's Manual. Minneapolis, MN, Prepare-Enrich, 1982.
  • 10李凌江 汪向东 王希林 马弘.Olson婚姻质量问卷.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:153-159.

共引文献218

同被引文献631

引证文献65

二级引证文献538

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部