期刊文献+

运算的经济性:从词库到句法 被引量:1

Computational Economy at the Lexicon-Computational System Interface
原文传递
导出
摘要 从"最简主义假设"出发,本文从理论内部和经验证据论证:为了确保词库和运算系统之间的接口处运算的经济性,运算系统在从词汇矩阵LA挑选词汇项目LI进行合并运算时,必须遵守两个原则:一为本文提出的"谓词优先选择原则"——计算系统从词汇矩阵LA中首先必须挑选谓词;二为"题元合并顺序原则"——题元合并的次序受题元阶层(thematic hierarchy)的调节和控制(何晓炜,1999)。同时本文还讨论了该假设所引起的一系列理论和经验上的意义。 Based on minimalist assumptions and taking a theoretico-empirical approach,this paper comes to the conclusion that in selecting lexical items for employment in the derivations,the computational system must observe two principles:(1) the 'predicate first' principle,which dictates that the computational system choose the predicate first,and(2) the 'merging order of arguments' principle,which dictates that the merging order of arguments be controlled and regulated by thematic hierarchy.
作者 唐玉柱
出处 《外国语言文学》 2008年第2期79-85,共7页 Foreign Language and Literature Studies
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究项目资助 项目批准号:05JJD740179
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1Chomsky, N. 1991a. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, ed. R. Freidin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • 2Chomsky, N. 1991b. Linguistics and adjacent fields: A personal view. In The Chomskyan Turn, ed. A. Kasher. Cambridge, Mass:Basil Blackwell.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 1995. A minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 15. Cambridge, Mass:MITWPL.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 1999. Derivation by phrase. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 18. Cambridge, Mass: MITWPL.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Ms., MIT.
  • 7Dai, M.C. 2002. Generalized leftward merger theory: A minimalist approach to adjuncts, existentials, parasitic gaps, and middle constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, Beijing Foreign Studies University.
  • 8Epstein, S. D., E. M. Groat, R. Kawashima & H. Kitahara. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. New York: OUP.
  • 9Kayne, R. 1992. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • 10David Basilico. Object Position and Predication Forms[J] 1998,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory(3):541~595

共引文献86

同被引文献29

  • 1宁春岩.并集对称合并和序偶非对称合并——句法演算的一个简约的新设想[J].现代外语,2002,25(3):221-230. 被引量:12
  • 2邵敬敏,周娟.汉语方言正反问的类型学比较[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,29(2):108-117. 被引量:37
  • 3Aldridge, E. Neg-to-Q: The Historical Origin and Devel- opment of Question Particles in Chinese [ J ]. The Linguis- tic Review (Special Edition on Particles in Syntax), 2011 (28) : 411 -447.
  • 4Bisang, W. Grammaticalization in Chinese: A Construc- tion - based Account [ C]//Traugott, E. C. & G. Trous- dale. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010:245 - 277.
  • 5Boeckx, C. On Long- Distance Agree [ J]. Iberia, 2009 (1) : 1 -32.
  • 6Chomsky, N. & H. Lasnik. The Theory of Principles and Parameters [ C]// J. Jacobs, A. Von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1993 (1):506-569.
  • 7Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program [ M ]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
  • 8Chomsky, N. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework [ C ]//R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2000 : 89 - 155.
  • 9Chomsky, N. Derivation by Phase [C]//M. Kenstowicz. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MITPress, 2001:1 - 52.
  • 10Chomsky, N. Beyond Explanatory Adequacy L CJ//A. Belletti. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syn- tactic Stractures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部