期刊文献+

腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术治疗T1肾癌

Clinical study of laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for T1 renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术治疗T1肾癌的方法和疗效。方法 肾癌患者32例。男24例,女8例。年龄31~72岁,平均49岁。均经B超、CT或MRI检查确诊为T1N0M0肾癌。肿瘤位于左肾21例,右肾11例;肾上极10例,下极13例,肾脏中部5例,近肾盂部位4例;偏背侧18例,腹侧14例。肿瘤平均直径(2.8±0.8)cm。25例行后腹腔途经,肿瘤位于偏腹侧者7例行经腹途径腹腔镜下保留肾单位术,均沿瘤体边缘外0.5cm处分离切除肿瘤。手术前后行肾核素扫描(ECT)检测分肾功能。结果 31例完成腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术,1例因缝合后肾脏渗血明显,中转开放手术。32例阻断肾蒂时间平均(24±4)min。3例开放血流后有明显渗血,均有2次阻断肾蒂史,阻断血管时间〉30min。31例平均手术时间(105±15)min,平均出血量(120±22)ml,6例术中输血400ml。5例肿瘤位于肾脏中部者术前放置双J管。3例切除肿瘤后暴露肾盏,于术后当日通过膀胱镜放置双J管引流,其中2例于术后2~3d发生漏尿,引流量200~300ml,分别于术后15、21d引流液<20ml后拔出负压引流管后愈合。术后复查SCr、BUN均正常。术后住院时间平均(9±2)d。术后病理报告切缘均未见肿瘤残留。平均随访(23±5)个月,肿瘤无复发。术后1个月B超和CT复查发现患侧肾手术部位局部血肿3例,术后3个月血肿吸收。术后15d复查双肾ECT,9例患侧肾血流较术前下降10%~15%,3例下降20%;术后1个月复查,7例患侧肾血流较术前下降10%~15%;术后(23±5)个月复查,仍有3例患侧肾血流较术前下降10%~15%。结论 腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术安全可行。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of T1 renal cell carcinoma. Methods Thirty-two patients (24 males and 8 females) were diagnosed with T1 N0 M0 renal cell carcinoma by ultrasound, CT or MRI and un- derwent laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery. The mean age was (49 ± 2)years old (from 31 to 72 years old). The mean tumor diameter was (2.8±0.8)era. There were 21 tumors in left kidney, 11 in right kidney. Of them, 10 tumors were in upper pole, 13 in lower pole, 5 in kidney center, 4 close to renal hilum, 18 in dorsal side and 14 in ventral side of the kidney. Tumor masses were resected with the surgical margin of 0.5 era. Twenty-five cases were done through retroperitoneal approach and 7 cases was done through transperitoneal approach. The pathological results showed that there were clear cell renal carcinoma in 28 cases, granule cell renal carcinoma in 3 eases and oncocytoma in 1 ease. Renal function was examined by ECT before and after the surgery. Results Thirty-one eases underwent laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery successfully and only one ease converted to open surgery due to excessive intra-operative bleeding. The mean renal pedicle blocking time was (24±4)min (from 19 to 52 min). There were 3 cases having blocking time longer than 30 rain (38 min, 45 min and 52 min) and accepted secondary blockage during the procedure. The mean operative time was (105±15) rain. The mean estimated blood loss was (120±22)ml. Only 6 cases accepted 400 ml blood transfu sion. D-J stents were placed in 5 cases with the tumor in kidney center before operation. In 3 cases with intra-operative exposure of renal calyx, D-J stents were placed after operation. Urine leakage in 2 cases were noted at 2 and 3 days and recovered at 15 and 21 days after operation. The mean hospital stay was (9±2)days. There was no recurrence in a mean follow-up time of (23±5)months. There were 3 cases with local hematoma (1 case of 4 cm×3 cm, 2 cases of 2 cm×3 cm) in the surgical site confirmed by ultrasound or CT scan 1 month after surgery and they disappeared 3 months after the operation. Serum creatinine and urea nitrogen were all in normal range after operation. Compared with renal blood flow of the operated kidney before operation, there were 9 cases decreased by 10%-15 and 3 cases decreased by 20% at 15 days, 7 cases decreased by 10%-15% at 1 month and 3 cases de creased by 10%-15%at (23±5)months after operation. Conchmion Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery is one of feasible and safe options for the treatment of T1 renal cell carcinoma.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期446-449,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 上海市科委医学引导科技项目(074119618)
关键词 肾肿瘤 腹腔镜 保留肾单位手术 Kidney neoplasms Laparoscopy Nephron sparing surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Novick A C. The role of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma in patients with a normal contra-lateral kidney. Advan Urol, 1996, 9:1-2.
  • 2Belldegrun A, Tsui K H, de Kernion J B, et al. Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma:analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17:2868-2875.
  • 3Fergany A F, Hafez K S, Novick A C. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow-up. J Urol, 2000, 163: 442-445.
  • 4Ghavamian R, Zincke H. Open surgical partial nephrectomy. Semin Urol Oncol, 2001, 19:103- 113.
  • 5Sutherland S E, Resnick M I, Maclannan G T, et al.Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol, 2002,167:61-64.
  • 6Gohji K, Hara I, Gotoh A, et al. Multifocal renal cell carcinoma in Japanese patients with tumors with maximal diameters of 50 mm. or less. J Urol (United States), 1998, 159:1144-1147.
  • 7Wunderlich H, Reichelt O, Schumann S, et al. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm. or less in diameter: indicated or under treated? J Urol (United States), 1998, 159:1465-1469.
  • 8Uzzo R G, Novick A C. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumdrs: Indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol, 2001, 166:6-18.
  • 9Jeschke K,Peschel R,Wakonig J,et al.Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors.Urology,2001,58:688-692.
  • 10Gill IS,Desai MM,Kaouk JH,et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor:duplicating open surgical techniques.J Urol,2002,167:469-476.

共引文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部