关系结构、信任与员工知识分享决策的关系研究被引量：10

Studies of the relationship of relational structure,trust,and employee's knowledge sharing decision

下载PDF

导出

摘要个体关系结构对于员工知识分享行为决策具有重要的影响,信任在其中发挥着关键性的作用。文章从关联强度和竞争两个维度,对个体间的关系结构特征进行了描述与测量,并利用实践调查数据,实证研究了个体关系结构特征、信任对员工知识分享决策的影响。结果表明,个体关系结构特征,主要通过影响私人间的信任水平,来影响双方的知识分享决策,其中关联强度对知识分享决策具有显著的正向影响,而竞争对于分享决策具有显著的负面影响。 Relational structure has important influence on employee＇ s knowledge sharing decision, among which trust plays a key role. This paper describes and measures the characteristics of relational structure between employees with two dimensions which are ties strength and competition. Through employing inquiry data, this paper empirically examined the influence of relational structure and trust on employee＇ s knowledge sharing decision. The results show that relational structure affects knowledge sharing decision mainly through interpersonal trust, in which ties strength has a positive effect on sharing decision, while competition has a negative one.

作者谢荷锋

机构地区南华大学经济管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第A01期145-151,共7页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70671051) 湖南省教育厅项目(06C741)

关键词关系结构信任知识分享 relational structure trust knowledge sharing

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1KPMG. Knowledge management research report 2002/2003 [ R]. KPMG Consulting Reports,2003.
2企业知识管理趋势:中国2006[R].蓝凌管理咨询支持系统有限公司,2007.
3Tsoukas H. The firm as a distributed knowledge system : a constructionist approach [ J ]. Strategic ManagementJournal, 1996,17 (winter) : 11 - 25.
4Nonaka I. The knowledge- creating company[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1991 (6) : 96 -105.
5Quinn J, Brain J, Anderson P, Finkelstein S. leveraging intellect [ J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1996,10(3) :7 -26.
6Fahey L, Prusak L. The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management [ J]. California Management Review, 1998, 40(3) :265 -276.
7Levin D, Cross R. The strongth of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer [ J ]. Management Science, 2003, 50 ( 11 ) : 1477 - 1490.
8Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties[ J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6) :1360 -1380.
9Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[ J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 (2) : 242 - 266.
10Tsai W, Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: an empirical study of intra - firm networks [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998,41 (4) :464 - 476.

二级参考文献76

1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量：986
2[2]Hasan H,Crawford K.Codifying or enabling:the challenge of knowledge management systems[J].J OPER RES SOC 54 (2):FEB 2003.
3[3]哈耶克.个人主义与经济秩序(中译本)[C].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1991.
4[4]Marwell.Altruism And The Problem of Collective Action[M].Academic Press,New York,1982.
5[5]Preffer.Six Dangerous myths About Pay[J].Harvard Business Review,1998,May-June.
6[6]Bengt Holmstrom.Moral Hazard in Teams[J].The Bell Journal of Economics,1998,Vol.13,No.2,Autumn.
7[7]Anial Arya,John Tellingham,Johnathan Gloven.Teams,repeated tasks,and implicit incentives[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1997,23.
8[8]Yeon-koo Che,S.Yoo.Optimal Incentives forTeams[J].American Economic Review,June 2001,Vol.91,No.3.
9[9]Jensen,Michael,K.Murphy.performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98.
10[10]Holmstron,B.,P.Migrom.Multi-task principal agent analyses:Incentive contrcts,asset ownership,and job design[J].Journal of law,Economics and Organazation,1991,7.