摘要
目的比较研究ECHO和ECHO加EP方案治疗小细胞肺癌的疗效、生存时间及毒副反应。方法53例小细胞肺癌接受系统化疗,26例在ECHO组,27例在ECHO加EP组。结果近期有效率比较,ECHO组局限期85.7%(6/7),广泛期78.9%(15/19);ECHO加EP组局限期83.3%(5/6),广泛期71.4%(15/21)。中位生存期两组分别为12月和11月。以上结果统计学处理均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。毒副反应主要为轻中度的消化道反应、骨髓抑制,ECHO加EP组消化道反应发生率较ECHO组高(P<0.01)。结论结果表明两组方案可作为小细胞肺癌的首选诱导缓解方案,ECHO加EP方案有助于克服ECHO使用中的耐药情况。
Objective To observe comparativelly the response rate 、 the survival time and the toxicity of either ECHO or ECHO+ EP combination chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer.Methods The 53 cases of small cell lung cancer were treated with systematic combination chemotherapy,26 cases in ECHO subset and 27 cases in ECHO+ EP subset.Results The response rate was 85.7%(6/7) and 83.3%(5/6) in limited stage,78.9%(15/19)and 71.4%(15/21)in extensive stage, respectivelly. The difference in median survival was 12 months and 11 months. The results showed the response rate and median survival in tow subsets were not statistically significant (P>0.05).Toxicities covered mainly the modest degrees of digestive disorder and myelosuppression 〔ECHO+ EP had higher toxic effect in digestive disorder(P<0.01)〕.Conclusion ECHO and ECHO+EP can be used as the primary regimens of renmission induction in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. ECHO+EP regimen is benificial to overcome the drug resistance of ECHO regimen
出处
《宁夏医学杂志》
CAS
1998年第1期16-17,共2页
Ningxia Medical Journal