崇祯本《金瓶梅》的评改者为汤显祖考论

Study on TANG Xian-zu as the Reviewer and Reviser of Jin Ping Mei of Chongzhen Version

崇祯本《金瓶梅》的评改者当下主要有李渔和冯梦龙两说,然"李渔说"明显不合理,"冯梦龙说"又没有提出证据,故在学界响应极少,反对的意见却很多。笔者最近从明代关于"汤显祖赏《金瓶梅词话》"、汤显祖与《金瓶梅》的关系以及崇祯本评语中的"情"与汤显祖的"至情"说相当接近等几个方面发现,崇祯本的评改者极可能为汤显祖。并认为崇祯本《金瓶梅》底本是万历本的抄本而非刊本。

It is mainly proposed nowadays that the reviewer and reviser of Jin Ping Mei of Chongzhen version is LI Yu or FENG Meng--long. But the two statements have little positive response but great disapproval in the academic world because that the parlance of LI is obviously unreasonable while there isn＇t any proof provided to support the parlance of FENG. With the study of TANG Xian--zu＇s Appreciation of Jin Ping Mei Cihua, the relationship between TANG and Jin Ping Mei, and the similarity between ＂qing （affection）＂ in the Chongzhen version and ＂zhiqing （true feelings）＂ proposed by TANG as well, the author believes that TANG is much more likely the reviewer and reviser of the Chongzhen version and the original version of Chongzhen version isn＇t a printed copy but a handwritten one in Wanli.