期刊文献+

盐酸布比卡因与不同药物配比用于腰-硬联合麻醉行剖宫产的评价 被引量:4

Comparison of the effects of bupivacaine combining different drugs in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨盐酸布比卡因与不同药物配比用于腰-硬联合麻醉行剖宫产的效果评价。方法90例剖宫产术患者随机分为A、B、C3组,每组30例,A组0.75%盐酸布比卡因1.0ml+麻黄素1.0ml(30mg);B组0.75%盐酸布比卡因1.0ml+麻黄素1.0ml(30mg)+10%GS1.0ml(共实用2.0ml);C组0.75%盐酸布比卡因1.5ml+10%GS1.0ml(共实用2.0ml),观察15min最高麻醉平面、止痛效果、低血压及恶心呕吐、头晕、胸闷、心悸等不良反应发生率。结果B组与A组比较差异无统计学意义,C组与A组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论CSEA用于剖宫产手术,0.75%盐酸布比卡因1.5ml+10%GS1.0ml(实用2.0ml)可安全有效的运用。 Objective To estimate the clinical effects of bupivacaine combining different drugs in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) with cesarean section. Methods 90 patients undergoing cesarean section were divided into three groups randomly for receiving CSEA with 0.75 % bupivacaine 1 ml and ephedrine 30mg in group A ( n = 30 ), 0.75 % bupivacaine 1 ml, ephedrine 30mg and 10% GS 1ml in group B( Practical volume 2ml, n = 30) ,0.75% bupivacaine 1.5ml and 10% GS lml in group C( Practical volume 2ml, n = 30 ). The highest plane of block analgesia, analgesic effect, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, chest tightness and palpitation were assessed after 15 min of CSEA. Results There's significance difference between C with A group( P 〈 0.05 ), and no difference between B with A group( P 〉 0.05). Conclusion It's a good anesthesia method for cesarean section with CSEA, and 0.75 % bupivacaine 1.5 ml with 10 % GS 1 ml ( Practical volume 2ml ) can obtained a better anesthesia effect.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2009年第2期222-223,共2页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 盐酸布比卡因 腰-硬联合麻醉 剖宫产手术 bupivacaine CSEA cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1庄心良,曾因明.现代麻醉学[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004,1102.

共引文献91

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部