期刊文献+

考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化 被引量:143

Optimal Production Policy with Emission Permits and Trading
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文旨在研究排放许可与交易机制对排放依赖性企业生产策略的影响。生产商可通过三种渠道获得排放许可:政府配额、市场交易和净化处理,并在不同渠道间取得平衡。本文分析了净化处理成本的特点,分别对确定净化水平与可控净化水平情况展开讨论,建立企业生产优化模型,得到了有排放限额下的最优生产策略。通过分析模型,得到了优先选择净化处理的充分必要条件,即"存在净化空间";此外还证实了最优策略的唯一存在性。最后通过数值分析说明了本文模型的应用,并采用灵敏度分析对参数影响加以分析。 The paper focuses on the impact of emission permits and trading on the production policy for emission-dependent firms. The firm might obtain emission permits in three different ways, i.e. government quota, market trade and purifying, and making a tradeoff between them. The characteristic of purifying cost is analyzed, based on it the cases of deterministic and variable purifying levels are investigated respectively. Then, an optimal production model with emission permits and trading is established. Additionally, a sufficient and necessary condition that the firm would prefer purification to trading is proposed, i.e. the so-called purifying domain is nonempty. Moreover, the existence and uniqueness of the optimal policy is guaranteed. Finally, a typical numerical example is employed to show the application of the model.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期81-86,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金(70821001) 国家自然科学基金杰出青年基金(70525001)
关键词 排放许可与交易 减排 净化 生产策略 emission permits and trading emission reduction purifying production policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 2香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 3魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 4Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 5Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 6Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 7Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.
  • 8Rehdanz, K. , Tol, R. S. J.. Unilateral Regulation of Bilateral Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emission Permits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 397-416.
  • 9Bernard, A. , Haurie, A. , Vielle, M. , Viguier, L.. A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 32(6): 1830-1856.
  • 10Cramton, P. , Kerr, S.. Tradeable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather [J]. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(4): 333-345.

共引文献31

同被引文献1295

引证文献143

二级引证文献1212

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部