期刊文献+

去病因健康调整期望寿命——一个新的疾病负担评价指标 被引量:11

Cause-excluded health adjusted life expectancy:a new indicator in measuring the burden of diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用去死因期望寿命、健康调整期望寿命、失能调整寿命年的原理和计算方法构建了一个全新的疾病负担评价指标——去病因健康调整期望寿命。去病因健康调整期望寿命通过虚拟死亡人数的概念将疾病导致的伤残和死亡结合到一起,从而解决了健康调整期望寿命难于应用于单个疾病的问题。去病因健康调整期望寿命概念上容易理解,在理论上有依据,计算方法上简单可行,不受评价人口的年龄构成影响,更有利于不同疾病、不同人群间疾病负担的比较。 Based on the integration of concept and methods of cause-eliminated life expectancy (CELE), health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) and disability-adjusted life year (DALY), a new index named canse-excluded health adjusted life expectancy (CEHALE) was developed in this study to evaluate the health impact(both fetal and non-fetal) of single disease. In order to include the impact of both premature death and health problems among those who are alive, the concept of suppositional death was introduced to calculate CEHALE. Cause-excluded health adjusted life expectancy developed in this study, should be not only easy to understand in concept, but also has theoretical support and be not affected by age structure, and be more suitable to use in comparison among different diseases and different population. Moreover, the new index is easy to calculate. So, CEHALE should be an ideal index to evaluate the impact of disease to population health.
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期655-658,共4页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 患病代价 评价研究 去病因健康调整期望寿命 Cost of illness Evaluation studies Cause-excluded health adjusted life expectancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1杨树勤.卫生统计学.3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1996:76-110.
  • 2World Health Organization. Estimates of healthy life expectancy for 191 countries in the year 2000: methods and resuhs[EB/OL]. [2008- 06-05]. http://www. whc.int/healthinfo/paper38. pdf.
  • 3Sullivan DF. A single index of mortality and morbidity. HSMHA Health Rep, 1971,86:347-354.
  • 4Wilkins R, Adams OB. Health expectancy in Canada, late 1970s: demographic, regional, and social dimensions. Am J Public Health, 1983,73 : 1073-1080.
  • 5Anand S, Hanson K. Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. J Health Econ, 1997,16:685-702.
  • 6National burden of disease studies[EB/OL]. [2008-06-05]. http:// www. who. int/mip/2003/other_documents/en/nbdstudies.pdf.
  • 7World Health Organization. Global burden of disease 2000:version 2 methods and results [ EB/OL] . [ 2008-06-05 ]. http:// www. who. int/healthinfo/paper50. pdf.
  • 8World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results [ EB/OL]. [ 2008-06-05 ]. http ://www. who. int/healthinfo/paper54. pdf.

共引文献3

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部