期刊文献+

不同检测系统胆固醇、三酰甘油的偏倚分析

Analysis on the biases of assaying serum cholesterol and triglyceride by different kinds of detection system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过不同检测系统的方法学比对分析,探讨各检测系统之间测定血清胆固醇、三酰甘油是否具有可比性。方法依据美国临床和实验室标准化研究所(CLSI)EP9-A2文件要求,每天随机从临床样本中抽取8份不同浓度的血清样本,分别用两种检测系统进行胆固醇、三酰甘油的测定,共测定5d,记录实验结果,将结果进行相关回归分析,计算在医学决定水平处的预期偏倚(B^c)和预期偏倚的95%可信区间,并判断偏倚是否可以接受。结果不同检测系统对胆固醇、三酰甘油测定结果的偏倚在允许误差范围内,两者结果具有可比性。结论当用两个以上的检测系统检测同一检验项目时,应进行方法比对和偏倚评估,判断其临床可接受性能,以保证检验结果的可比性。 Objective To investigate the comparability of the different kinds of detection system in measuring serum cholesterol and triglyceride and compare the two analysis systems. Methods Based on the guideline of CLSIEP9-A2,involved serum cholesterol and triglyceride were measured randomly from 8 serum samples with different concentration by the two types of detection system for five days, and the results were recorded at the same time. All of the results were subjected to accumulate the relativity coefficient. The 95% confidence interval of Bc (bias at medical decision level X) were calculated to estimate acceptability of the bias. Results The results of all the bias of serum cholesterol and triglyceride results were accepted within the range of the allowable error by different types of analytic systems, and the results gained from the two types of detection systems were comparable. Conclusion When the same test item is analyzed by the two detection systems,it is necessary to evaluate the clinical acceptability to insure the reliablity of the results.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2009年第17期1433-1434,1436,共3页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 EP9-A2 方法比对 偏倚评估 预期偏倚 EPg-A2 method comparison bias estimation predicted bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1NCCLS. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples: NCCLS Document EPg-A2, ISBN 1-56238-472-4 [S]. Wayne, PA : NCCLS, 2002.
  • 2周新,涂植光,郑铁生.临床生物化学和生物化学检验[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:34.
  • 3U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare,Medicaid and CLIA program:Regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment of 1988(CLIA). Final rule[H]. Fed Regist, 1992,57 (40): 7002-7186.
  • 4魏吴 丛玉隆.医学实验室质量管理与认可指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2004.27-80.
  • 5张秀明,李炜煊,郑松柏,陈滨鸿,曹永坚,孙蕾,林莲英,柯培锋,马骥.不同检测系统17项常规生化结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学,2007,22(2):166-170. 被引量:47

二级参考文献3

  • 1张秀明,郑松柏,孙蕾,柯培锋,马骥,张文,林莲英.应用Westgard方法评价决定图判断生化检测系统性能的可接受性[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(1):86-90. 被引量:73
  • 2National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples[S].Approved Guideline,2nd ed,EP9-A2,2002.
  • 3Ricos C,Alvarez V,Cava F,et al.Current databases on biological variation:pros,cons and progress[J].Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1999,59(7):491-500.

共引文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部