期刊文献+

烧骨基因位点保存状况及检测方法比较 被引量:1

Conservation of burned bone DNA and comparison of its detection methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同温度焚烧的股骨中基因位点的保存状况及其检测方法。方法:常压下以100℃~500℃对30例成人股骨进行焚烧,提取其存留DNA,用Identifiler试剂盒和Minifiler试剂盒进行荧光标记和复合扩增,ABI3130xl Genetic Analyzer软件对DNA基因位点进行检测和分析。结果:提取骨密质中的DNA可以获得正确分型,未烧和5个温度焚烧后基因位点存留不同,Mifiler试剂盒比Identifiler试剂盒更能从烧骨DNA中得到STR基因座分型结果。D21S11、FGA2个位点在2个试剂盒中的检出率差异无统计学意义。2个试剂盒中的FGA位点检出率都不高。结论:温度对骨DNA的保存有很大影响,检测焚烧程度高的骨骼DNA时用Minifiler试剂盒更容易得到基因分型结果。FGA位点不适合作为miniSTR位点用于检测烧骨等降解检材。 Objective: To explore different temperature incineration of the femur in the state of conservation of sites and detection methods. Methods: 30 samples of adult femur were incinerated at 100℃ - 500℃ in a normal pressure and concentration, following fluorescent labelling and multiplicity amplification by AmpFLSTR Identifiler PCR kit and Minifiler kit, and genetic locus was analyzed using ABI 3100xl Genetic Analyzer software. Results: Right type was acquired from the extraction of bone quality of DNA. The site without firing was different from that with burning after 5 temperature retention. Minifiler kit acquired more loci results than Identifiler kit. There was no significant difference in the detection rate between D21Sll and FGA in two detection kits. The detection rate of FGA sites in two kits was not high. Conclusion, Temperature has great influence on the preservation of bone DNA. Milifiher, kit is preferable to deted the DNA of destroyed bone FGA site is not suitable as a site for testing miniSTR degradation samples, such as burned bone.
出处 《解剖学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期527-529,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anatomy
基金 辽宁省教育厅科技基金资助(202173376)
关键词 烧骨 DNA检验 短串联重复序列 个体识别 burned bone DNA testing short tandem repeat individual identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Thompson T J. Heat induced dimensional changes in bone and their consequences for forensic anthropology[J]. J Forensic Sci, 2005,50 (5):1008-1015.
  • 2Tsukada K, Takayanagi K, Asamura H, et al. Multiplex short tandem repeat typing in degraded samples using newly designed primers for the TH01, CSF1PO, and vWA loei[J]. Legal Med, 2002,4 : 239-245.
  • 3De Gruchy S, Rogers T L. Identifying chop marks on cremated bone: a preliminary study[J]. J Forensic Sci, 2002, 47 (5): 933-936.
  • 4Hiller J C, Thompson T J, Evison M P, et al. Bone mineral change during experimental heating:an X-ray scattering investigation[J]. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(28):5091-5097.
  • 5Whitaker J P, Clayton T M, Urquhart AJ, et al. Short tandem repeat typing of bodies from a mass disaster; high success rate and characteristic amplification patterns in highly degraded samples [J]. Biol Teeh, 1995,18(4) : 670-677.
  • 6Butler J M, Shen Y, McCord B R. The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA[J]. J Forensic Sci, 2003,48(5) : 1054-1064.
  • 7Yoshida K, Sekiguchi K, Kasai K, et al. Evaluation of new primers for CSF1PO[J]. Int J Legal Med, 1997,110(1):36-38.
  • 8徐国昌,侯续伟,任甫,席焕久,郑坤,涂政,刘志芳,叶健.不同温度焚烧对成人股骨16个基因位点的影响[J].解剖学杂志,2008,31(3):406-408. 被引量:9
  • 9张继宗,王北瑜.炭化尸体的法医学鉴定[J].刑事技术,2000,25(2):36-37. 被引量:7

二级参考文献9

  • 1叶健,季安全,赵兴春,涂政,张志强,朱世峰,袁丽.烧骨DNA检验技术的研究[J].法医学杂志,2004,20(3):155-159. 被引量:12
  • 2杨周岐,张虎勤,张金,赵文明.古人类骨骼DNA降解影响因素分析[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(1):90-92. 被引量:18
  • 3Timken M D, Swango K L, Orrego C. A duplex real-time qPCR assay for the quantification of human nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in forensic samples: implications for quantifying DNA in degrade samples [J]. J Forensic Sci, 2005,50(5):17-34.
  • 4Von Wurmb-Schwark N, Ringleb A, Gebuhr M, et al. Genetic analysis of modern and historical burned human remains [J]. Anthropol Anz, 2005,63(1) :1-12.
  • 5Thompson T J. Heat induced dimensional changes in bone and their consequences for forensic anthropology [J]. J Forensic Sci, 2005,50(5) :1008-1015.
  • 6De Gruchy S, Rogers T L. Identifying chop marks on cremated bone: a preliminary study [J]. J Forensic Sci, 2002, 47 (5): 933-936.
  • 7Hiller J C, Thompson T J, Evison M P, et al. Bone mineral change during experimental heating: an X-ray scattering investigation [J]. Biomaterials, 2003,24(28) : 5091-5097.
  • 8Sajantila A. The polymerase chain reaction and post-mortem forensic identify testing: application of amplified DIS80 and HLA-DO to the identification of fire fire victims [J]. Forensic Sciences Int, 1991,51(1) :23.
  • 9张继宗,王北瑜.炭化尸体的法医学鉴定[J].刑事技术,2000,25(2):36-37. 被引量:7

共引文献13

同被引文献14

  • 1叶健,季安全,赵兴春,涂政,张志强,朱世峰,袁丽.烧骨DNA检验技术的研究[J].法医学杂志,2004,20(3):155-159. 被引量:12
  • 2郑秀芬.法医DNA分析[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2002.37-59.
  • 3Schuliar Y, Knudsen PJ. Role of forensic pathologists in mass disasters[J]. Forensic Sci Med Pathol, 2012,8 (2) : 164-173.
  • 4Jules A,Kieser,Joy T,et al. Morphoscopic analysis of ex- perimentally produced bony wounds from low-velocity ballistic impact[J]. Forensic Sci Med Pat,2011,7(4) :322- 332.
  • 5Konstantinos M, Chara S. Identification and differential diagnosis of perimortem blunt foree trauma in tubular long bones[J]. Forensic Sci Med Pat, 2006,2(4): 221- 229.
  • 6Cartiser N, Bfvalot F, Fanton L, et al. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicologya review[J]. Int J Legal Med,2011,125(2): 181-198.
  • 7Thompson TJ. Heat-induced dimensional changes in bone and their consequences for forensic anthropology[J]. J Forensic Sci,2005,50(5) :1008-1015.
  • 8Steadman DW,Diantonio LL,Wilson J J, et al. The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recov- ery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone[J]. J Forensic Sci,2006,51(1) :11-17.
  • 9Hartman D, Drummer O, Eckhoff C, et al. The contribu- tion of DNA to the disaster victim identification(DVI) el- fort[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2011,205 (1-3) : 52-58.
  • 10Ubelaker DH. The forensic evaluation of burned skeletal remains : a synthesis[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2009,183 (1-3) 1-5.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部