期刊文献+

语言非礼貌现象及非礼貌理论的完善 被引量:19

Linguistic Impoliteness and the Improvement of Impoliteness Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有的语用学礼貌理论不足以解释语言交际中的非礼貌现象,需要补充完善。完整的礼貌理论应该包括礼貌策略和非礼貌策略。礼貌和非礼貌同处于一个程度等级不同的连续体中。实例证明,R udanko的非礼貌策略有一定的解释力,但尚有完善的余地。 The politeness theory advocated by Brown & Levinson and others is not sufficient to explain the impoliteness in linguistic communication and is in need of perfection. Linguistic evidence shows that the strategies of nastiness put forward by Rudanko have explanatory power but leave room for perfection. The author believes that a complete politeness theory should consist of politeness strategies and impoliteness strategies and that different scales of politeness and impoliteness can be located in the same continuum.
作者 谢世坚
出处 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期73-78,共6页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 礼貌理论 非礼貌策略 连续体 politeness theory strategies of impoliteness continuum
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. London : Longman, 1983.
  • 2Grice, H. Paul. Logic and conversation[C]//Peter, Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academy Press,1975.
  • 3Kopytko ,Roman. Politeness Discourse in Shakespeare's English[M]. Poznan: Uniwersytet ira. Adam Mickiewicza, 1993.
  • 4Culpeper, Jonathan. (Ira)politeness in dramatic dialogue [C]//Culpeper, Jonathan, et al. (eds.) Exploring the Language of Drama. Routledge: London, 1998.
  • 5Lakoff, Robin. The Logic of Politeness; or Minding Your P's and Q's[C]. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 1973:272-305.
  • 6Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. Universals in Language Usage : Politeness Phenomena [C]//E. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
  • 7Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. Politeness Some Universals in Language Usage[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 8Culpeper, Jonathan, et al. Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 35, 2003 : 1545-1580.
  • 9Fraser, Bruce and William Nolen. The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form [J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 1981: 93- 109.
  • 10Labor, William and David Fanshel. Therapeutic Discourse[M]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1977.

二级参考文献40

共引文献12

同被引文献91

引证文献19

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部