期刊文献+

论人类学取向的民族地区教育研究方法论之革新——经典文化概念的局限及其克服 被引量:7

A Probe into the Innovation of the Methodology of Anthropology-oriented Education in Ethnic Territory——The Limitation and Resolution of the Definition of Classical Culture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 加强人类学方法的应用,是民族教育研究体现特色和进一步深化的一个基本途径,但我国民族教育研究者应当注意的是,人类学核心概念——文化的经典观念在今天日益暴露出局限。其一,将文化假设为匀质的疆界分明的铁板,忽视文化内部的多样性和文化间的互动。其二,将文化视为无时间性的静态性实体,忽视其历史流变。其三,暗含着若干二元对立,即文化与自然的对立,社会建构与个体建构的对立,主观与客观的对立。针对这些局限,笔者初步建议有三:其一,推敲文化概念这类方法论的基础知识;其二,及时借鉴国外新近成果,但注意使之在我国本土化,尤其是重视东西方民族问题的差异;其三,要跨学科地走向开放,尤其是向长于个体层次分析的心理学等学科借鉴,以弥补经典人类学偏重群体层次分析的局限。 The application of anthropological methods is one of the primary approaches that is helpful to the feature and further development of ethnic educational studies. However, we should be careful that in today's world we can see more and more faults of the classic assumptions of culture, the core concept of anthropology. First, a culture is assumed as a homogenous iron board with a clear boundary, which fails to explain the intemal diversity of a culture or the cultural interactions. Second, a culture is considered to be a timeless static entity, which fails to explain its historic changes.Third, the concept implies some dichotomies, culture VS nature, social construct VS individual construct, subjective VS objective. In order to avoid these faults, this author offers suggestions that the concept of culture should be further studied; we must introduce the frontier fruits of foreign studies of this concept, but pay attention to the difference of ethnic matters between West and East, so we must localize them in China; we must be open towards interdisciplinary, learn from psychology that is skilled at individual level analysis so as to overcome the fault of the analysis of anthropology that is skilled at population level.
作者 常永才
出处 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》 CSSCI 2009年第5期20-24,32,共6页 Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划课题"民族地区农村初中生学习的人类学研究"[CMA060256]
关键词 民族教育 人类学方法论 文化概念 局限 建议 ethnic education anthropological methodology concept of culture faults suggestions
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1常永才.全国教育科学规划与民族教育学科的发展:回顾与展望[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2007,33(5):120-125. 被引量:2
  • 2滕星.国外教育人类学学科历史与现状.民族教育研究,1999,(4):30-40.
  • 3古塔,弗格森.人类学定位--田野科学的界限与基础[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005.
  • 4张雯.英美系统与德俄系统的教育人类学之比较初探[A].吴天泰.教育人类学[C].台湾:五南图书出版公司,2002.
  • 5I.华勒斯坦.开放社会科学(刘锋译)[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.
  • 6乔治·E.马尔库斯,米开尔·M.J.费彻尔.作为文化批评的人类学:一个人文学科的实验时代(王铭铭,蓝达居译)[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
  • 7麦克尔·卡里瑟斯戒们为什么有文化[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
  • 8Claudia Strauss,Naomi Quinn. A Congnitive Theory of Cultural Meaning [M].UK:Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 9陈连开.论中华文明起源及其早期发展的基本特点[EB/OL].http://www.china10k.com/simp/history/1/11/11z/11z20/11z2002.htm,2006-07-18.
  • 10张诗亚.“位育”之道——全球化中的华人教育路向[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,32(6):53-55. 被引量:35

二级参考文献21

共引文献388

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部