期刊文献+

不同外碳源对污泥反硝化特性的影响 被引量:69

Sludge Denitrification Characteristics with Different External Carbon Source
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了选择最优的反硝化外投碳源,应用SBR和A/O反应器,系统地研究了甲醇、乙醇和乙酸钠作为外碳源时污泥的反硝化特性.甲醇、乙醇和乙酸钠作为外碳源时污泥的比反硝化速率分别为3.2 mg/g·h^(-1)、9.6 mg/g·h^(-1)和12 mg/g·h^(-1).甲醇和乙醇作为外碳源时污泥产率大致相同(约为0.40 g/g),而乙酸钠作为外碳源其污泥产率最高(0.65 g/g),甲醇作为外碳源时系统启动时间和驯化期长,不能迅速地响应进水水质的变化.乙醇是反硝化处理系统的最优外加碳源,具有反硝化速率高、污泥产率低、响应迅速、来源广且对环境的影响小等优点. In order to select the best external carbon source for denitrification, the denitrification characteristics of the commonly used external carbon sources, methanol, ethanol and acetate have been studied using the SBR reactor and A/O nitrogen removal process. Results showed that the different external carbon sources had significantly influenced denitrification activity and process. It had Been found that the specific denitrification rates of methanol, ethanol and acetate were reached up to 3.2 mg/g· h^-1, 9.6 mg/g·h^-1 and 12 mg/g·h^-1, respectively. The sludge yield of methanol and ethanol was similar (about 0.4 g/g), while the sludge yield of acetate was very high (0.65 g/g). In addition, nitrogen removal was enhanced immediately after ethanol and acetate addition. However, methanol as carbon sources didn't response immediately and had a long adaptation time. By comparison, ethanol was the best external carbon source, for its high denitrification rate, low sludge yield, quick response, easily obtained and low influence on environment.
出处 《北京工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期820-824,共5页 Journal of Beijing University of Technology
基金 北京市科技计划项目资助(D07050601500000) 国家"十一五"重大科技专项课题资助(2008ZX07317-007-1) 北京市高校人才强教深化计划高层次人才资助项目(PHR20090502)
关键词 反硝化特性 甲醇 乙醇 乙酸钠 外碳源 denitrification characteristics methanol ethanol acetate external carbon sources
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1NYBERG U,ANDERSSON B,ASPEGREN H.Long-term experiences with external carbon sources for nitrogen removal[J].Wat Sci To=h,1996,33(12).109-116.
  • 2HALLIN S,LINDBERG C F,PELL M,et al.Microbial adaptation,process performance and a suggested control strategy in a pre-denitrification system with ethanol dosage[J].Wat Sci Tech,1996,34(1-2):91-99.
  • 3CHRISTENSSON M,LIE E,WELANDER T.A comparison between ethanol and methanol as carbon sources for denitrification[J].Wat Sci Tech,1994,30(6):83-90.
  • 4HALLIN S,PELL M.Metabolic properties of denitrifying bacteria adapting to methanol and ethanol in activated sludge[J].Wat Res,1998,32(1):13-18.
  • 5BOLZONELLA D,INNOCENTL L,PAVAN P,et al.Denitrification potential enhancement by addition of anaerobic fermentation products from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste[J].War Sei Tech,2001,44(1):187-194.
  • 6CLAUS G,KUTZNER H J.Denitrification of nitrate and nitric acid with methanol as carbon source[J].Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,1985,22:378-381.
  • 7ISAACS S H,HENZE M,SOEBERG H,et al.External carbon source addition as a means to control an activated sludge nutrient removal process[J].Wat Res,1994,28(3).511-520.
  • 8马勇,彭永臻,王晓莲,祝贵兵.前置反硝化的碳源投加前馈—反馈控制器[J].中国给水排水,2003,19(10):41-43. 被引量:3
  • 9马勇,彭永臻,王淑莹,王晓莲.前置反硝化工艺外碳源投加串级控制策略研究[J].中国环境科学,2004,24(2):214-218. 被引量:5

二级参考文献8

  • 1Samuelsson P,Carlsson B. Feediorward control of the external carbon flow rate in an activated sludge process[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2001,43( 1 ) :115 - 122.
  • 2Yuan Zhiguo,Bogaert Herwig. Control of external carbon addition to predenitrfying systems[J]. Journal of EnvironMental Engineering, 1997,123(11) : 1080 - 1086.
  • 3Marsili libelli S, Giunti L. Fuzzy predictive control for nitrogen removal in biological wastewater treatment [ J ]. Water Science and Technology, 2002,43 (4 - 5) : 37 - 44.
  • 4Lindberg C F, Carlsson B. Adaptive control of the external carbon flow rate in an activated sludge process [J]. Wat. Sci. Tec., 1996,34(3-4): 173-180.
  • 5Singman J. Efficient control of wastewater treatment plant-a benchmark study, MSc thesis [Z]. Sweden: Department of Earth Science, Uppsala University, 1999.20-25.
  • 6Henze M, Grady, Jr C P L, et al. Activated sludge model No.1, IAWQ Scientific and Technical report No.1 [Z], IAWQ, London: 1996.
  • 7Takacs I, Patry G G, Nolasco D. A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process [J]. Wat.Res., 1991,25(10):1263-1271.
  • 8Alex J, Beteau J F, Copp J B, et al. Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants [M]. Karlsruhe: Europen control conference, 1999.

共引文献5

同被引文献623

引证文献69

二级引证文献478

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部