期刊文献+

使用抗淋巴制剂治疗难治性排斥反应的临床观察 被引量:5

The clinical effect of ATG and OKT3 on the treatment of refractory rejection after cadavaric kidney transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)和单克隆抗体CD3(OKT3)对难治性排斥反应的疗效。方法87例患者,其中ATG组13例,平均治疗总量1000mg;OKT3组74例,平均治疗总量45mg。结果ATG组对急性加速性排斥反应治愈2例;对急性排斥反应治愈7例;总有效率为6923%(9/13)。OKT3组对急性加速性排斥反应治愈率为9000%(27/30);对急性排斥反应治愈率为9047%(38/42);总有效率为9028%(65/72)与ATG组有显著性差异(P<005)。其中对再次移植患者的各种急性排斥反应有效率为9167%(11/12)。结论OKT3治疗难治性排斥反应的效果优于ATG,尤其对再次移植患者。 Objective To observe the effect of ATG and OKT3 on the treatment of refractory rejection, including acute and chronic rejection after cadaveric kidney transplantation. Method 87 patients with refractory rejection after cadaveric kidney transplantation were treated by using ATG (13 patients) and OKT3 (74). A total dose of 1000 mg for ATG group or 45 mg for OKT3 group was administered for each patient. Result Two accelerating rejection and acute rejection were reversed and 7 in the ATG group, 9000% (27/30) and 9047% (38/42) in the OKT3 group respectively. A significant difference of total reverse rates was seen between the ATG and OKT3 groups (6923% verse 9028%, P<005). In retransplant patients, the reverse rate of acute rejection by OKT3 was 9167% (11/12). But OKT3 did not show any effect in patients with chronic rejection. Conclusion OKT3 is better than ATG for reversing the refractory rejection, especially in retransplant patients, but it has no any effect on chronic rejection.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第9期542-544,共3页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 肾移植 药物疗法 免疫排斥 ATG OKT3 Kidney transplantation Transplantation immunology Drug therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1敖建华,中华泌尿外科杂志,1995年,16卷,682页
  • 2Kahan B D,肾脏移植,1991年,1页

同被引文献23

  • 1杨俊伟,黎磊石.移植肾的慢性排异反应[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,1994,3(5):423-428. 被引量:6
  • 2王跃闽,谢桐.ALG和AHTG在肾移植术后急性肾功能衰竭中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(3):138-140. 被引量:4
  • 3H. Anderas Bock, Harald Gallati, Regula M, et al . A randomized prospective trial of prophylactic immunosuppression with ATG-Fresenius versus OKT3 after renal transplantation [J]. Transplantation , 1995, 59(6): 830-840.
  • 4Norman DJ, Shield CF, Barry J, et al . Early use of OKT3 monoclonal antibody in renal transplantation to prevent rejection[J]. Am J Kidbey Dis , 1998, 11(2): 107-110.
  • 5Norman DJ, Kahana L, Stuart F, et al . A randomized clinical trial of induction therapy with OKT3 in kidney transplantation [J]. Transplantation , 1993, 55(1): 44-50.
  • 6H. Andreas Pock, Harald Gallati, Regula M, et al. Arandomized prospective trial of prophylactic immunosuppression with ATG-Fresenius versus OKT3 after renal transplantation [J]. Transplantation , 1995, 59(6): 830-840.
  • 7Brennan DC, Schnitzler MA, Baty JD, et al. A pharrrfacoeconomic comparison of antithymocyte globulin and muromonab CD3 induction therapy in renal transplant recipients [J]. Pharmacoeconomics , 1997, 11(3).. 237-245.
  • 8Schroeder TJ, First MR. Monoclonal antibody in organ transplantation[J]. Am J Kidney Dis , 1994, 23(1) : 138-147.
  • 9Mariat C, Alamartine E, Diab N, DE Filippis JP, et al . A randomized and prospective study comparing treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulie with monoclonal antibodies for rescue of kidney grafts with steroid-resistant rejection[J]. Transplantation , 2001, 71(1): 53-58.
  • 10Midtvedt K. Individualized T cell monitored administration of ATG versus OKT3 in steroid-resistant kidney graft rejection [J]. Clin Transplant , 2003, 17(1): 69-74.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部