期刊文献+

批判性话语分析对教育研究的意义 被引量:22

The Contribution of Critical Discourse Analysis to Educational Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 围绕着语言与社会之间的双向建构,英国社会语言学家费尔克拉夫深入探讨了话语在何种程度上受制于具体的社会情境,又在何种程度上积极地推动社会变迁。在方法论上,由于批判性话语分析特别强调在情境中体会语义和语用,所以民族志与文本分析必须在研究过程中相互交织在一起。在意义诠释的基础上,批判性话语分析还具有一层"批判的维度"。研究者需借助社会学及教育学的相关理论去挖掘蕴含在文本之中的权力。从批判性话语分析的视角出发来研究教育问题,我们能够获得以往的社会研究模式无法提供的新视野。 Centering on the bi-directional construction of language and society, Fairclough, the sociolinguist of the UK, has deeply studied in which level the disourse has been restricted by specific social environment, and in which level the disourse has initiatively promoted social transformation. In methodology, since the critical discourse analysis (CDA) has especially emphasized on the understanding of semantics and pragmatics, therefore, ethnography and text analysis should be intertwined in the research process. On the basis of meaning interpretation, CDA has also had "critical dimension". The researchers should explore the power containing in the text with the help of relevance theories of sociology and pedagogy. Studying educational problems in the perspective of CDA, we can obtain a new field that the former social research mode could not provide.
作者 王熙
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期41-46,共6页 Educational Research
关键词 批判性话语分析 话语秩序 权力关系 教育研究 critical discourse analysis, orders of discourse, power relation, educational research
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics [ M ]. London : Verso, 1985.
  • 2Reed, M. The limits of discourse analysis in organisational analysis[J]. Organisation, 2000, (7).
  • 3Philips, L., Jorgensen, M.W.Discourse analysis: As theory and method [ M ]. London : Sage, 2004.
  • 4Fairclough, N.Critieal discourse analysis, organisational discourse, and organisational change [ J ] .Organization Studies, 2005, (6).
  • 5Chouliaraki, L.and Fairclough, N.Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis [M]. Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
  • 6Rogers, R. An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education[ M ]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2004.120.
  • 7Fairclough, N. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research[M]. London: Routledge, 2003.
  • 8Halliday, M.A.K. Explanations in the functions of language [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1993.
  • 9王攀峰.批判性话语分析:当代教育研究的一个新视角[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008(5):81-86. 被引量:17
  • 10Fairclough, N. Discourse and social change[M]. London: Longman, 1992. 73.

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1]Kress,G.Representational Resources and the Production of Subjectivity.Caldas-Coulthard,R.C.,Couhhard,M.Texts and practice:Reading in Critical Analysis.Routledge,1996.
  • 2[2]Stefan Titscher,Micheal Meyer,Ruth Wodak and Eva Vetter.Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis.London:SAGE Publications.
  • 3[3]Lutz,C.The Domain of emotion words on ifaluk.American Ethnologist,1982 (9).
  • 4[4]Parker,I.Discourse Dynamics:Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology.London:Routledge,1992.
  • 5[6][英]诺曼·费尔克尔夫.话语与社会变迁[M].殷晓蓉译.北京:华夏出版社.2003.

共引文献16

同被引文献279

引证文献22

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部