摘要
本文通过对34种藏缅语的比较,发现工具格标记存在粘着式和分析式两种不同的类型。藏缅语的工具格标记,无共同来源,是后来各个语言自己创新的。
Through a comparison of the instrumental cases in 34 Tibeto-Burman languages, it is discovered that the instrumental markers can be classified into two types, the agglutinative and the analytical respectively. The markers are not cognate in the Tibeto-Burman languages, but rather innovative devices acquired separately in later evolution after their split with each other.
出处
《民族语文》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期41-48,共8页
Minority Languages of China
