期刊文献+

刘熙《释名》与汉代文体形态研究

A Study of the Relation between Liu Xi’s Work ‘Shi Ming’ and the Literary Forms in the Han Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刘熙《释名》共八卷二十七类,其中《释言语》、《释书契》、《释典艺》、《释乐器》四类涉及40余种文体,是汉代人记录和训释文体类别最多的著作。《释名》作为一部训诂词典,着眼现实,大大拓展了汉代文体的著录和训释范围,反映了汉代文体的实存情况和当时的文体观念,即重视应用文体甚于文学文体。《释名》在文体的著录范围、声训方法、解释内容诸方面,都对后世文体论著作如《文心雕龙》等产生过一定影响。从文体史眼光研究《释名》相关材料,有助于理解汉代到魏晋六朝之间文体论承上启下的环节。 Mr. Liu Xi’s work ‘Shi Ming’ (An Explanation of Names) has eight volumes included 27 types of name. Among them, the four types, ‘the Explanation of words’, ‘the explanation of books’, ‘the explanation of classical arts’ and ‘the explanation of music instruments’, concern with more than 40 types of literary forms. So, it is a work recorded and explained the most literary forms in the Han dynasty. ‘Shi Ming’, as a dictionary searching explanation of ancient words, explored a large scope of literary form and explanation, with a realistic view, which reflects the existing circumstances and the concept of literary form at that time, i.e. a view emphasizing the applicable forms rather than literature styles. That’s why ‘Shi Ming’ made an influence on the later works on literary forms, such as ‘Wen Xin Diao Long’ etc. especially in the scope of recording works, the method of explaining meaning according the pronunciation of words, and the content of explanation.
作者 何志军
出处 《学术研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期146-153,共8页 Academic Research
基金 暨南大学人文社科项目"东汉文体形态研究"(51104630)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1吴承学,何诗海.简谈文学史史料的发掘和处理[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,42(4):45-48. 被引量:4
  • 2刘熙著,毕沅疏证,王先谦补,祝敏彻、孙玉文点校.释名疏证补[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
  • 3刘勰著,詹镆义证.文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989:394,403.
  • 4严可均编.全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
  • 5刘熙著,任继昉纂.释名汇校[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2006.
  • 6阮元校刻.十三经注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
  • 7许慎著,段玉裁注.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
  • 8永瑢等.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
  • 9章学诚著,仓修良新编.文史通义新编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
  • 10李善等.六臣注文选[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1999:386.

二级参考文献61

共引文献1015

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部