期刊文献+

基于第二价格预拍的竞标者合谋均衡分析 被引量:6

Equilibrium Analysis of Bidder Collusion Based on the Second-price Pre-auction Knockout
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文假设合谋竞标者在拍卖之前采用第二价格预拍的合谋机制,求解了第一价格拍卖下的合谋均衡。我们不但考虑了拍卖方对于合谋的最优策略性响应,而且考虑了参与合谋的竞标者与没有参与合谋的竞标者之间的策略性响应,研究表明没有参与合谋的竞标者为了抵消合谋竞标者对于自己的不利影响,在竞价时考虑到合谋的存在会比不存在合谋条件下的竞价更具有进取性,而且拍卖方合理的设定保留价格对于合谋的难易有重要影响。 This paper assumes that the collusive bidders take advantage of the second-price pre-auction knockout collusive mechanism,and solves the collusion equilibrium under the first price main auction.We not only consider the auctioneer's strategic response to collusion,but also consider the strategic responses between collusive bidders and non-collusive bidders.The main result shows that,compared to competitive biddings without collusions,the bidding of non-cartel members will become more aggressive to counteract disadvantage from cartel members.Furthermore,setting a reasonable reserve price by the auctioneer has significant effect on bidder collusion.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期132-140,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
关键词 第二价格预拍 竞标者合谋 保留价格 the second-price pre-auction knockout bidder collusion reserve price
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Feinstein, J. S. , Block, M. K. , Nold, F.D.. Asymmetric information and collusive behavior in auction markets [J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (3):441--460.
  • 2Porter, R. H. , Zona, D. J.. Detection of bid-rigging in procurement auctions [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(3): 518--538.
  • 3Hendricks, K. , Porter, R. H.. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information [J. The American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 865--883.
  • 4Hendricks, K. , Porter, R. H. , Tan,G.. Bidding rings and the winner's curse [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2008, 39(4): 1018--1041.
  • 5Porter, R. H. , Zona, D. J.. Ohio school milk markets: An analysis of bidding [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1999, 30(2)I 263--88.
  • 6Pesendorfer, M.. A study of collusion in first-price auctions [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67 , (3): 381--411.
  • 7Cramton, P. C. , Schwartz, J. A.. Collusive bidding:Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctions [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2000, 17(3): 229--252.
  • 8Cramton, P. C. , Schwartz, J.A.. Collusive bidding in the FCC spectrum auctions E J2. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2002, 1(1), Article 11.
  • 9Hoppe, H. , Jehiel, P. , Moldovanu, B.. License auctions and market structure [J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2006, 15(2): 371--396.
  • 10Baldwin, L. H., Marshall, R. C., Richard, J. F.. Bidder collusion at forest service timer sales [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, 105(4): 657--699.

二级参考文献57

共引文献51

同被引文献55

  • 1Fishman M J. A theory of preemptive takeover bidding [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(1):88-101.
  • 2Hirshleifer D, P'ng I. Facilitation of competing bids and the price of a takeover target [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1989,2 : 587-606.
  • 3Bulow J, Huang M, Klemperer P. Toeholds and takeovers[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1999,107(3):427-454.
  • 4Shapiro C. Theories of oligopolistic behaviour[M]. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1989,1:329- 414.
  • 5McAfee R P, McMillan J. Bidding rings[J]. The American Economic Review,1992,8(3):579-599.
  • 6Kofman F, Lawarree J. Collusion in hierarchical agency[J]. Econometrica, 1993,61 : 629-656.
  • 7Graham D A, et al. Collusive bidder behavior at single-object second price and English auctions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1987, 95 (6): 1217- 1239.
  • 8Feinstein J S, Block M K, Nold F C. Asymmetric in- formation and collusive behavior in auction markets [ J ]. The American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (3) : 441 - 460.
  • 9Porter R H, Zona J D. Detection of bid rigging in procurement auctions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993: 518 -538.
  • 10Porter R H, Zona J D. Ohio school milk markets: an analysis of bidding [ R]. National Bureau of Economic Re- search, 1997.

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部