期刊文献+

物理内容标准与考试之间的一致性研究 被引量:18

Alignment between the Physics Content Standard and the Exam
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内容标准和考试之间的一致性对社会、学科教学及测验的效度来说都十分重要。我们研究比较了初中物理课程标准和2009年某省中考物理试卷之间的一致性。为了计算两者的一致性指标,我们运用一个共同的结构框架来标记内容标准和考试。结果表明,相对于物理内容标准,考试提高了对认知水平的要求;同时,考试比内容标准更强调"电"的知识,所以两者之间的一致性不够。内容标准和考试之间的一致性程度可能影响物理课堂教学。 Alignment between content standards and standardized tests is a significant issue to society, science pedagogy, and test validation. This study compares the alignment between Chinese National Junior Physics Curriculum Standards and Standardized Test of X Province in China in 2009. The same coding framework is used to sign the content standards and standardized tests. It has been found that there is not a statistically significant alignment between them. The insignificant alignment is due to a shift toward higher level cognitive reasoning skills from content standards to standardized tests. The insignificant alignment is also due to a heavier emphasis on "electricity" in the test than in the content standard. The insignificant alignments may result in desirable and undesirable effects on guiding classroom instruction.
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第7期67-71,共5页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
关键词 一致性 物理内容标准 考试 alignment physics content standard exam
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Xiufeng Liu, Baohui Zhang, Ling L Liang, Gavin Fulmer, Beaumie Kim, Haiquan Yuan. Alignment Between the Physics Content Standard and the Standardized Test: A Comparison Among the United States-New York State, Singapore, and China- Jiangsu [J]. Science Education, 2008, 22 (12).
  • 2Ling L Liang, Haiquan Yuan. Examining the Alignment of Chinese National Physics Curriculum Guidelines and 12^th-grade Exit Examinations: A case study [J]. International Journal of Science Education. 2008, 30 (13): 1823-1835.
  • 3中华人民共和国教育部.全日制义务教育物理课程标准(实验稿)[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社.2002:9-31.
  • 4盛群力,褚献华.布卢姆认知目标分类修订的二维框架[J].课程.教材.教法,2004,24(9):90-96. 被引量:163

二级参考文献3

  • 1Anderson L. W, Krathwohl D. R. et. al. Taxonomy for Leafing, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom ' s ,Taxonomy of Educational Objectives ( Abridged Edition.) [M]. New York: Longman. 2001.38-62, 63-92.
  • 2Krathwohl, D. R. A Revision of Bloom's Taxconomy: An Overview [J]. Theory into Practice, 2002,(4): 212-218.
  • 3L.W.安德林 L.A.索斯尼克 谭晓玉 袁文辉 译.布卢姆教育目标分类——40年的回顾[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1998,8..

共引文献164

同被引文献69

引证文献18

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部