摘要
内容标准和考试之间的一致性对社会、学科教学及测验的效度来说都十分重要。我们研究比较了初中物理课程标准和2009年某省中考物理试卷之间的一致性。为了计算两者的一致性指标,我们运用一个共同的结构框架来标记内容标准和考试。结果表明,相对于物理内容标准,考试提高了对认知水平的要求;同时,考试比内容标准更强调"电"的知识,所以两者之间的一致性不够。内容标准和考试之间的一致性程度可能影响物理课堂教学。
Alignment between content standards and standardized tests is a significant issue to society, science pedagogy, and test validation. This study compares the alignment between Chinese National Junior Physics Curriculum Standards and Standardized Test of X Province in China in 2009. The same coding framework is used to sign the content standards and standardized tests. It has been found that there is not a statistically significant alignment between them. The insignificant alignment is due to a shift toward higher level cognitive reasoning skills from content standards to standardized tests. The insignificant alignment is also due to a heavier emphasis on "electricity" in the test than in the content standard. The insignificant alignments may result in desirable and undesirable effects on guiding classroom instruction.
出处
《课程.教材.教法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第7期67-71,共5页
Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
关键词
一致性
物理内容标准
考试
alignment
physics content standard
exam