期刊文献+

经济增长、亲贫式支出与国民幸福——基于中国幸福数据的实证研究 被引量:70

Economic growth, propoor spending and national happiness——Empirical study based on China’s well-being data
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用2001年和2007年世界价值观调查数据的中国部分,运用有序概率模型考察经济增长、亲贫式支出对我国居民主观幸福感的影响。实证分析发现:(1)无论是在动态的时间序列上还是静态的省际横截面上,我国都出现了经济增长与国民幸福感发生背离的现象,即存在"幸福悖论";(2)由教育、医疗和社会保障构成的亲贫式支出对国民幸福感有显著的促进作用,它可以作为解决"幸福悖论"的重要手段,并有利于促进国民幸福的持续提升。因此,提高经济增长质量,增加亲贫式支出应为增强居民幸福感的题中之义。 Using the data of World Values Survey concerning China from 2001 to 2007, we adopt Ordered Probability Model to examine the influence of economic growth, pro - poor spending on the subjective well - being of Chinese residents. The empirical analysis finds that: (1) Whether in a dynamic time series or at the static inter - provincial cross - section, there is a phenomenon of the deviation of economic growth from national happiness in China, i.e., "happiness paradox"; (2) pro - poor spending consisting of education medical care and social security plays an obviously positive role in improving national happiness, it can be an important means to solve the problem of "happiness paradox", and it benefits the continuous improvement of national happiness. As a result, to improve the quality of economic growth and increase pro - poor spending should be the focus of enhancing the residents' happiness.
出处 《经济学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期5-14,共10页 Economist
基金 国家人文社会科学基金面上项目"基于亲贫式增长(PPG)的农村支出结构研究"(批准号:09BJL034) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"基于主观满意度的农村公共支出结构优化研究"(批准号:09YJA790078)的资助
关键词 经济增长 亲贫式支出 主观幸福感 生活满意度 Economic growth Pro -poor spending Subjective well -being Life satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1DI TELLA, R., MACCULLOCH, R., and OSWALD, A. Preferences Over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness[J]. The American Economic Review, 2001, 91 (1): 335 - 341.
  • 2FREY, B. and STUTZER, A. What can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? [J] . Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(2): 520-578.
  • 3ALESINA, A., DI TELLA, R., and MACCULLOCH, R. Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different? [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, 88(9- 10): 2009- 2042.
  • 4CLARK, A., FRIJTERS, P., and SHIELDS, M. A. Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2008, 46 (1): 95 -144.
  • 5FERRER- I -CARBONELL, A. Income and Well- being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2005, 89(5-6): 997- 1019.
  • 6DI TELLA, R and MACCULLOCH, R. Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20(1 ): 25 - 46.
  • 7黄有光.福祉经济学:一个趋于更全面分析的尝试[M].辽宁:东北财经大学出版社,2005.
  • 8RAM, R. Government Spending and Happiness of the Population: Additional Evidence from Large Cross- Country Samples[J]. Public Choice, 2009, 138(3): 483-490.
  • 9LANA and SILVIA. Investigating Macroeconomic Determinants of Happiness in Transition Countries: How Important is Government Expenditure?[C]. 15th Dubrovnik Economic Conference, 2009.
  • 10BJORNSKOV, C., DREHER, A. and FISCHER, J. A. The Bigger the Better? Evidence of the Effect of Government Size on Life Satisfaction around the World[J]. Public Choice, 2007, 130(3 -4): 267 -292.

共引文献2

同被引文献1055

引证文献70

二级引证文献730

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部