期刊文献+

EGFR和c-Met基因的相对拷贝数在非小细胞肺癌预后中的意义 被引量:11

Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Met gene copies for prognostic evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过研究非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)病人组织中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和c-Met的DNA相对拷贝数的变化,探讨EGFR和c-Met基因在NSCLC发生发展和预测预后过程中的作用。方法采用实时荧光定量PCR方法检测61例NSCLC病人组织中EGFR和c-Met的DNA相对拷贝数,分析它们之间的相关性,以及与各种临床病理特征的关系,并进行生存分析比较。结果 EGFR和c-Met的DNA相对拷贝数的相关系数r=0.352,P=0.005,呈显著性正相关。EGFR和c-Met DNA在吸烟患者中的相对拷贝数分别为0.15和0.13,均高于不吸烟患者;在腺癌中的相对拷贝数分别为0.16和0.14,均高于鳞癌,上述差异经检验有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在鳞癌患者中,EGFR和c-Met DNA相对拷贝数越高则预后越差,经Log-Rank检验,两组病例生存差别有统计学意义(P=0.015,P=0.046)。结论 EGFR和c-Met在NSCLC的发生和发展中可能存在相互或协同作用,能够对鳞癌患者进行预后评估。 Objective To investigate the role of epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) and c-Met in the oncogenesis,development and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods The relative copy numbers of EGFR and c-Met mRNA were detected in 61 cases of NSCLC by fluorescent RT-PCR,and the correlation between EGFR and c-Met as well as their correlation to the clinicopathological data of the patients were analyzed.A survival analysis was also performed in relation to EGFR and c-Met expressions.Results The relative copy numbers of EGFR and c-Met were positively correlated(r=0.352,P=0.005).The levels of these two genes in smokers were 0.15 and 0.14,respectively,significantly higher than those in non-smokers(P0.05);their levels were 0.16 and 0.14 in adenocarcinoma,respectively,significantly higher than those in squamous carcinomas(P0.05).In patients with squamous carcinomas,a higher level of EGFR and c-Met DNA copies was associated with poorer prognosis,and Log Rank analysis indicated a survival difference in relation to EGFR and c-Met DNA copies(P=0.015,P=0.046).Conclusion EGFR and c-Met may interact in a synergistic manner in the oncogenesis and development of NSCLC,and may help in the prognostic evaluation of squamous carcinomas.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期285-288,共4页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 陕西省卫生厅科学研究基金(08D28)
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 表皮生长因子受体 肝细胞生长因子受体 实时定量PCR non small cell lung cancer epidermal growth factor receptor c-Met real-time PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2001, 37(Suppl 8): S4-66.
  • 2Chiang WF, Liu SY, Yen CY, et al. Association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number amplification with neck lymph node metastasis in areca-assoeiated oral carcinomas [J]. Oral Oncol, 2008, 44: 270-6.
  • 3赵乐,陈葳,李旭.实时定量PCR方法检测宫颈癌组织中SNAIL mRNA的表达[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2008,39(3):414-417. 被引量:2
  • 4Airman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, et al. Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1994, 86: 829-35.
  • 5Guo A, Villen J, Kornhauser J, et al. Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-Met LJ]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008, 105(2): 692-7.
  • 6Nakamura Y, Niki T, Goto A, et al. c-Met activation in lung adenocarcinoma tissues: An immunohistochemical analysis [J]. Cancer Sci, 2007, 98(7): 1006-13.
  • 7Van Dyke AL, Cote ML, Prysak GM, et al. COX-2/EGFR expression and survival among women with adenocarcinoma of the lung[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2008, 29(9): 1781-7.
  • 8Sasaki H, Shimizu S, Okuda K, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification in surgical resected Japanese lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2009, 64: 295-300.
  • 9Resniek MB, Routhier J, Konkin T, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor, c-MET, β-catenin, and p53 expression as prognostic indicators in stage II colon cancer: a tissue microarray study [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10: 3069-75.
  • 10K~ AW, Shi GM, Zhou J, et al. Role of overexpression of CDISI and/or c-Met in predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Hepatology, 2009, 49(2): 491-503.

二级参考文献14

  • 1张阿丽,王全胜,陈刚,钟亚华,谢丛华,周云峰,马丁.Snail与E-cadherin在上皮性肿瘤中的表达及其临床意义[J].肿瘤,2006,26(5):469-471. 被引量:14
  • 2Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer,2002 ,2(6):442-454.
  • 3Peinado H, Portillo F, Cano A. Transcriptional regulation of cadherins during development and carcinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol,2004,48(5-6) :365-375.
  • 4Batlle E, Sancho E, Franci C, et al. The transcription factor SNAIL is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial turnout cells. Nature Cell Biol,2000;2(2):84-89.
  • 5Cano A, Perez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, et al. The transcription factor SNAIL controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol, 2000 ,2 (2) : 76-83.
  • 6Blaneo MJ, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrio D, et al. Correlation of SNAIL expression with histological grade and lymph node status in breast carcinomas. Oneogene, 2002, 21 (20): 3241-3246.
  • 7Kurrey NK, Amit K, Bapat SA. SNAIL and Slug are major determinants of ovarian cancer invasiveness at the transcription level. Gynecol Oncol,2005,97(1) :155-165.
  • 8Roy HK, Smyrk TC, Koetsier J, et al. The transcriptional repressor SNAIL is overexpressed in human colon cancer. Dig Dis Sci,2005,50(1) :42-46.
  • 9Boulay JL, Dennefeld C, Alberga A. Tbe Drosopbila developmental gene SNAIL encodes a protein with nucleic acid binding fingers. Nature, 1987 , 330(6146) : 395-398.
  • 10Alberga A, Boulay JL, Kempe E, et al. The SNAIL gene required for mesoderm formation in Drosophila is expressed dynamically in derivatives of all three germ layers. Development, 1991 ,111 (4) : 983-992.

共引文献1

同被引文献129

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部