期刊文献+

NIHSS绝对值变化与NIHSS变化率对脑梗死患者残疾预测能力的比较研究 被引量:52

The comparison research of the absolute change of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) scores with the percent change of NIHSS scores to predict the functional outcome of the patients with stroke
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)绝对值的变化与NIHSS变化率对脑梗死患者功能残疾的预测价值。方法采用前瞻性设计对10个临床研究中心急性期脑梗死患者的数据进行分析,筛选出入院当天、发病90d NIHSS评分和BI数据资料完整患者953例,按入院时NIHSS评分分为轻、中、重度,以BI作为功能残疾疗效判定"金标准",应用ROC比较NIHSS绝对值变化与NIHSS变化率对患者功能残疾的判断价值。结果轻、中、重度患者AUC曲线下面积分别为0.60、0.76、0.93,与AUC曲线下面积=0.50比较,中、重度患者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NIHSS变化率在轻、中、重度患者中分别为0.76、0.85、0.97,与AUC曲线下面积=0.50比较,差异均有明显统计学意义(P<0.01)。脑梗死患者良好功能结局的最佳NIHSS绝对值变化的界值在轻、中、重度患者中分别为2.5、4.5、14.5;敏感性分别为0.57、0.92、1.00,特异性分别为0.61、0.50、0.89;NIHSS变化率的界值在轻、中、重度患者中分别为70.8%、74.7%、84.9%;敏感性分别为0.63、0.82、1.00,特异性分别为0.78、0.75、0.94。结论 NIHSS绝对值变化、NIHSS变化率对患者功能残疾的预测能力随着神经功能缺损程度的增加而增大,而后者对结局预测能力更佳。 Objective To evaluate the value of the absolute and percent change of NIHSS scores to predict the functional outcome of the patients with stroke.Methods We prospectively analyzed clinical data of 953 patients derived from 10 clinical stroke research centers with NIHSS scores at admission and on 90d and BI scores were included.According to NIHSS scores,the severity of diseases was divided into three levels:mild,moderate,and severe.BI scores were used as gold standard to define the therapeutic efficiency of disability.ROC analyses were chosen to evaluate the value of the absolute and percent change of NIHSS scores to predict the outcomes.Results ROC analysis revealed that AUC value of the absolute change of NIHSS scores in three levels were 0.60,0.76 and 0.93,respectively.Compared to AUC value of 0.50,the difference between the moderate and severe levels were significant(P0.05).In the absolute change of NIHSS scores,the best cutoff value for three levels were 2.5(sensitivity 0.57,specificity 0.61),4.5(sensitivity 0.92,specificity 0.50) and 14.5(sensitivity 1.00,specificity 0.89),respectively.ROC analysis revealed that AUC value of the percent change of NIHSS scores in three levels were 0.76,0.85 and 0.97,respectively.Compared to AUC value of 0.50,the difference in the three levels were significant(P0.01).In the percent change of NIHSS scores,the best cutoff value for three levels were 70.8%(sensitivity 0.63,specificity 0.78),74.7%(sensitivity 0.82,specificity 0.75) and 84.9%(sensitivity 1.00,specificity 0.94),respectively.Conclusions The predictive abilities of the absolute and percent change of NIHSS scores are more powerful in severe strokes,and the latter has better predictive ability.
出处 《中风与神经疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期156-158,共3页 Journal of Apoplexy and Nervous Diseases
基金 国家科技重大专项"重大新药创制"<显示中医药疗效优势的中药临床药效评价关键技术研究>课题(2009ZX09502-028)
关键词 NIHSS绝对值变化 NIHSS变化率 脑梗死 功能结局 残疾 Absolute change of NIHSS score Percent change of NIHSS score Stroke Functional outcome Disability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1蔡业峰,贾真,张新春,招远祺,王立新,郭建文,欧爱华,梁伟雄,裴建,黄燕,黄培新.美国国立卫生院卒中量表(NIHSS)中文版多中心测评研究--附537例缺血中风多中心多时点临床测评研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2008,31(7):494-498. 被引量:446
  • 2Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing [J]. Cerebrovasc Diseases,2009,27(2) : 119 - 122.
  • 3各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33037
  • 4国家中医药管理局脑病急症科研组.中风病辨证诊断标准(试行).北京中医药大学学报,1994,17(3):64-66.
  • 5Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, et al. Disability measures in stroke:relationship among the barthel index,the functional independence measure, and the modified rankin scale [ J]. Stroke,2004,35 (4) :918 -923.
  • 6Adams HP,Davis PH,Leira EC,et al. Baseline NIH stroke scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke :A report of the trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST) [ J ]. Neurology, 1999,53 (1) :126 -131.
  • 7Young FB, Weir C J, Lees KR. Comparison of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale with disability outcome measures in acute stroke trials [ J ]. Stroke,2005,36 : 2187 - 2192.
  • 8Bruno A, Saha C, Williams LS, et al. Percent change on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: A Useful Acute Stroke Outcome Measure [ J ]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2009,18 ( 1 ) :56 - 59.
  • 9王琳,宿英英.基底动脉尖综合征预后预测的研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2007,7(6):437-439. 被引量:10
  • 10Yoo A J, Barak ER, Copen WA, et al. Combining acute diffusionweighted imaging and mean transmit time lesion volumes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score improves the prediction of acute stroke outcome[ J ]. Stroke ,2010,41 ( 8 ) : 1728 - 1735.

二级参考文献18

  • 1黄新民,付桂丽,张曦,刘庆,张卫卫,陈赞军.21例老年人基底动脉尖综合征临床及CT分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(3):182-185. 被引量:4
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33037
  • 3BOGOUSSLAVSKY J, HENNERICI MG. Stroke scores and scales[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1992, 2:239.
  • 4BAMFORD J, DENNIS M, SANDERCOCK P, et al. The frequency, causes and timing of death within 30 days of acute stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) [ J ]. J Neurology Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1990,53 : 824 - 29.
  • 5郭爱华.实用医学调查分析技术[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2005.262.
  • 6TZU K S,SU C C ,SHU H Y,Assessing reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the stroke scale: Scale development [ J ]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2006,43:457-463.
  • 7GOLDSTEIN LB, SAMSA GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale: extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial[J]. Stroke, 1997, 28:307 -310.
  • 8TILLEY BC, MARLER J, GELLER NL. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Trial Study. Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial [ J ]. Stroke, 1996,27 : 2136 - 2142.
  • 9Caplan L. “Top of the basilar” syndrome [J]. Neurology, 1980,1(30):72-79.
  • 10Arnold M, Nedeltchev K. Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occusiontreated with intra-arterialthrombolysis[J]. J Neurosurg-Psychiaty, 2004,6 ( 75 ) : 857-862.

共引文献33593

同被引文献488

引证文献52

二级引证文献778

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部