期刊文献+

在线英语写作自动评价系统应用研究述评 被引量:112

Using automated writing evaluation in classroom assessment:A critical review
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文回顾和分析了迄今为止国内外对英语写作自动评价系统的相关应用研究成果,发现教育技术的引进不仅是技术层面的问题,它还意味着一场牵扯到使用者理念、认识、方法和行为等方面的系统变革。我们认为关注结果同时关注过程和过程参与者的研究,在获得应用结果的同时,还能够揭示可能影响教育技术应用效果的关键因素,必然会引发更加深入的研究和基于理性的教学变革,因此是今后研究的方向。 The paper reviews research on using online Automated Writing Evaluation(AWE) in the classroom.It starts with a brief overview of the history of AWE development and major AWE systems in use.Then the paper reviewed major product-based and process-based AWE studies.The product-based AWE research conducted by AWE developers mostly examined whether the system could produce writing gains and the result seemed to be positive.The process-based AWE research studied the use of AWE as an instructional tool and yielded varied findings.It is argued that the successful use of AWE in education calls for a paradigm shift from the perspectives of teachers,learners and administrators and the combination of process/product research approach would be able to present a clear picture of how AWE impacts the learner,the teacher,the teaching and learning process and outcome.
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期273-282,321,共10页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题“基于现代信息技术的形成性评价工具的应用研究”(GFA097005)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Attali, Y. 2004. Exploring the feedback and revision features of criterion [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA., America, April 2004.
  • 2Attali, Y. &J. Burstein. 2006. Automated essay scoring with e-raterar^Rv. 2 [OL]. http://escholarship, bc. edu/cgi/viewcontent, cgi? article = 1049&context-- jtla (accessed 16/03/2010).
  • 3Chen, E. & E. Cheng. 2008. Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes [J]. Language Learning & Technology 12: 94-112.
  • 4Dernyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 5Elliot, S. & C. Mikulas. 2004. The impact of MY Access ! use on student writing performance.. A technology overview and four studies [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA., America, April 2004.
  • 6Ericsson, P. & R. Haswell (eds.). 2006. Machine Scoring of Student Essays : Truths and Consequences [C]. Logan, UT. : Utah State University Press.
  • 7Grimes, D. 2008. Assessing automated assessment.. Essay evaluation software in the classroom [OL]. ftp://ftp, ics. uci. edu/pub/grimesd/AutoAssessment, pdf (accessed 20/06/2010).
  • 8Hoon, T. 2006. Online automated essay assessment: Potentials for writing development [OL]. http://ausweb, scu. edu. au/aw06/papers/refereed/tan3/paper, html (accessed 09/08/2010).
  • 9Landauer, T., D. Laham & P. Foltz. 2003. Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor [A]. In M. Shermis & J. Burstein (eds.). Automated Essay Scoring, A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [C]. Mahwah, N. J, : Lawrence Erlbaum 87-112.
  • 10Page, E. 2003. Project essay grade: PEG [A]. In M. Shermis &J. Burstein (eds.). Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [C]. Mahwah, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum. 43-54.

二级参考文献77

  • 1吴会芹.用现代化手段辅助语言测试[J].外语电化教学,2006(3):49-53. 被引量:5
  • 2Burstein J. The e-rater scoring engine : Automated essay scoring with natural language processing [ A ]. In Shermis M D & Burstein J (eds.). Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [ C ]. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. 113 - 122.
  • 3Burstein J & Chodorow M. Automated essay scoring for nonnative English speakers [ EB/OL ]. http ://www. ets. org/Media/Research/pdf/erater_ac199rev. pdf, 1999 - 06/2006 - 03 - 20.
  • 4Burstein J, Chodorow M & Leacock C. Criterion Online Essay Evaluation : An Application for Automated Evaluation of Student Essays [ EB/OL]. http://citeseer, ifi. unizh. ch/cache/papers/cs/28192/http:zSzzSzwww. ets. orgzSzresearchzSzdloadzSziaai03bursteinj, pdf/burstein03criterion. pdf, 2003/2006 -03 -20.
  • 5Dikli S. Automated essay scoring [ J ]. Turkish Online Journal of Distanee Education, 2006, 7 (1) :49 -62.
  • 6Elliot S. IntelliMetric: From here to validity [ A ]. In Shermis M D & Burstein J (eds.). Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [ C]. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. 71 -86.
  • 7Fohz P W, Gilliam S & Kendall S A. Supporting content-based feedback in online writing evaluation with LSA [ J ]. Interactive Learning Environments, 2000, 8 ( 2 ) : 111 - 129.
  • 8Keith T Z. Validity of Automated Essay Scoring Systems [ A]. In Shermis M D and Burstein J (eds.). Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [ C ]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. 147 - 168.
  • 9Kukich K. Beyond Automated Essay Scoring [ A ]. In Hearst M A ( ed. ). The debate on automated essay grading [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2000, (5) :27 -31.
  • 10Landauer T K & Dumais S T. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge [ J ]. Psychological Review, 1997, ( 104 ) : 211 - 240.

共引文献241

同被引文献709

引证文献112

二级引证文献686

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部