期刊文献+

风险投资机构的网络位置与成功退出:来自中国风险投资业的经验证据 被引量:69

Venture Capital Firms’ Network Positions and Their Successful Exits: Empirical Evidence from China’s Venture Capital Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究中国本土风险投资机构间的网络联结对投资结果的影响。运用清科数据库2000年1月1日至2009年12月31日的数据,研究发现风险投资机构的网络位置对成功退出有显著的影响——风险投资机构的网络中心性越高,成功退出的可能性越大。具体而言,本文的研究结论可概括如下:投资机构的网络联结数量越多,成功退出的可能性越大;投资机构的网络联结质量越高,成功退出的可能性越大;投资机构促成的网络联结数量越多,成功退出的可能性越大;投资机构收到的网络联结数量越多,成功退出可能性越大。 Network ties between organizations are both widespread and important, as they allow organizations to gain access to resources that may be difficult to develop or acquire otherwise. Network ties also feature prominently in the venture capital industry. Venture capital firms tend to syndicate their investments with other venture capital firms, rather than investing alone, which gives rise to the coinvestment networks. This paper focuses on the impact of network ties between China's local venture capital firms on their investment outcomes. Using data from Zero2IPO Database during the period from January 1st of 2000 to December 31st of 2009, after controlling for other known determinants such as investment experience, syndication size, investment round, market competition, exit condition, as well as investment year and industry fixed effects, we find that venture capi- tal firms' network position exerts significant influence on the ratio of successful exit, that is, venture capital firms with higher network centrality could expect higher ratio of successful exit. Specifically, our findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Degree centrality influences exit significantly, indicating that venture capital firms benefit from having many ties; (2) Eigenvector centrality exercises the most significant influence, suggesting that the quality of network ties is of great power over explaining successful exit; (3) The effect of betweenness centrality on successful exit is insignificant, illustrating that the ability to act as a broker between other venture capital firms is not of great importance; (4) Outdegree centrality has the largest impact on successful exit economically, showing that the capability of generating network ties is very important; (5) Indegree centrality also affect exit significantly, proving that receiving more ties is helpful for venture capital firms to exit successfully. To test robustness of our findings, we use a wide range of specifications. It is clearly shown that our finds are strong and robust.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期82-91,101,共11页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70972051) 陕西省软科学计划重点项目(2009KRZ02)资助
关键词 风险投资机构 网络联结 网络位置 网络中心性 成功退出 Venture Capital Firm Network Tie Network Position Network Centrality Successful Exit
  • 相关文献

参考文献64

  • 1Granovetter, M.. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3): 481-510.
  • 2Burt, R.. Structural Holes. MA: Harvard University Press, 1992: 19-21.
  • 3Ahuja, G.. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(3): 425-455.
  • 4Sorenson, O., Stuart, T. E.. Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments. American Journal of Sociology, 2001, 106(6): 1546-1588.
  • 5Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., Eisenhardt, K. M.. Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms, and Corporate Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53(2): 295-332.
  • 6Uzzi, B.. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 1996, 61(4): 674-698.
  • 7Gulati, R.. Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(4): 619-652.
  • 8Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Smith-Doerr, L.. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.
  • 9Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., Silverman, B. S.. Don't Go It Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups' Performance in Canadian Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 267-294.
  • 10Podolny, J. M.. Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39(3): 458-483.

二级参考文献33

  • 1彭华涛,谢冰.联合风险投资的网络特性与价值溢出机理分析[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(4):45-48. 被引量:12
  • 2张新立,孙康.风险投资家联合投资的主要功能分析[J].高科技与产业化,2006,12(7):27-29. 被引量:3
  • 3Dirk Bergemann. Venture capital financing,moral hazard,and learning[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1998,22:703- 735.
  • 4Elitzura B, Gavious A. Contracting, signaling, and moral hazard: A model of enuepreneurs, ‘Angels,' and venture capitalists[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2003, 18: 709- 725.
  • 5Wilson R. The theory of syndicates[J]. Econometrics, 1968,1:119- 132.
  • 6Coe D T, Helpman E. International R&D spillovers [J]. European Economy Review, 1995.39: 859 ~ 887.
  • 7Amir R,Wooders J. One-way spillovers, endogenous innovator/imitator roles and research joint ventures [J]. Games and Economic Behavior,2000.31:1 ~ 25.
  • 8Kwang In Hur, Chihiro Watanabe. Unintentional technology spillover between two sectors: kinetic approach [J] . Technovation, 2001.29: 227~ 235.
  • 9刘健钧.创业投资制度创新论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.
  • 10Joshua Lerner. Venture Capitalists and the Decision to Go Public. Journal ofFinacial Econmics, 1994, 35(7): 31-69.

共引文献36

同被引文献918

引证文献69

二级引证文献616

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部