摘要
国际商事仲裁员披露义务对仲裁员具有强制性,仲裁当事人通常可以通过协议排除仲裁员披露义务在仲裁程序中的强制适用;仲裁员披露义务的主客观标准之争在理论上或许是有意义的,但在仲裁实践中两种标准出现了融合的趋势;仲裁员披露应坚持书面披露和持续披露的程序要求;仲裁员未履行披露义务,当事人可以通过撤销仲裁裁决的方式获得司法救济,但仲裁员仅在存在主观故意不披露的情况下,才需要承担有限的民事赔偿责任。我国仲裁法应在借鉴世界主要国家和国际主要仲裁规则对此问题规定的基础上,完善我国仲裁员披露义务规则。
The duty of disclosure of international commercial arbitrators is compulsive to arbitrators,but this enforcement can be excluded by the party of arbitration in arbitral proceedings through agreement between themselves;In arbitral practice,the subjective and objective criterion appeared a tendency of syncretism,though maybe the argument between two sides is significative theorectically.The duty of disclosure ought to according to the procedure of written disclosure and on-going disclosure;The party of arbitration can obtain judicial remedies via a way of quashing the arbitration award when a arbitrator failed to fulfill the duty of disclosure,but the arbitrator don't have civil viability of compensation unless he certainly had requisite mental intent.In the law of arbitration in China,we need to improve the regulations and rules of the duty of disclosure of arbitrators,based on a source of reference of related regulations from primary arbitration rules in main countries and areas.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期79-85,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
国际商事仲裁员
披露义务
强制性
主客观标准
International commercial arbitrators
duty of disclosure
enforcement
subjective and objective criterion