期刊文献+

短节段加伤椎固定结合硫酸钙填充治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折 被引量:15

The treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture by using vertebroplasty combined with the fixation of injured vertebra
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨短节段加伤椎固定结合硫酸钙填充治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的临床效果。方法:2005年1月~2008年10月,对91例胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者分别采用短节段加伤椎固定结合硫酸钙椎体成形(A组,32例)、短节段加伤椎固定(B组,29例)和短节段固定结合硫酸钙椎体成形(C组,30例)治疗。所有患者术后至少随访13个月。对三组患者的临床资料(包括术前、术后及末次随访的Cobb角、伤椎前缘高度比值和VAS疼痛评分等)进行比较分析。结果:三组病例在年龄、性别、损伤节段和术前神经功能方面无显著性差异(P>0.05)。随访中有神经功能损害的患者Frankel分级都有1~2级的神经功能恢复。B组手术时间和术中出血量(83.5±15.6min,226.4±28.5ml)比A组(93.5±13.4min,243.4±30.4ml)、C组(90.4±13.3 min,237.4±25.5ml)少(P<0.05)。术前三组椎体前缘高度比值(48.6%±8.1%,47.3%±8.6%,47.9%±7.7%)、Cobb角(28.6°±4.2°,28.8°±5.7°,29.8°±4.5°)比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后A组(96.2%±3.2%,5.2°±1.2°)、B组(96.8%±3.5%,5.3°±1.1°)优于C组(94.8%±4.3%,6.3°±1.8°)(P<0.05);末次随访时A组(96.1%±2.6%,5.7°±2.6°)优于B组(93.7%±3.7%,6.8°±3.1°)和C组(94.2%±3.3%,29.8°±4.5°)(P<0.05)。三组丢失的椎体前缘高度、Cobb角比较A组(2.1%±0.1%,1.2°±0.8°)、C组(2.3%±0.1%,1.4°±0.5°)小于B组(5.1%±0.2%,3.7°±1.6°)(P<0.05)。末次随访时VAS评分三组之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。B组1例螺钉断裂,C组有1例内固定松动移位,A组无内固定失败病例。结论:短节段加伤椎固定结合硫酸钙椎体成形治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折能够有效恢复并维持伤椎的高度,提供了伤椎前中柱支撑和固定,疗效较好。 Objective:To explore the clinical treatment results for thoracolumbar burst fracture by using vertebroplasty with calcium sulfate cement combined with the fixation of injured vertebra.Method:From January 2005 to December 2008,91 patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture were divided into three groups:group A,32 patients underwent three-level fixation including fractured vertebra using vertebroplasty with injectable calcium sulfate;group B,29 patients were fixed three-level verbebra including injured vertebra;group C,30 cases underwent short-segment fixation combined with injectable calcium sulfate vertebroplasty.The least follow-up time was 13 months.Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared among 3 groups.Result:The 3 groups were similar in age,sex,fracture levels and preoperative neurologic status distribution.All patients with neurologic deficits were improved at the final follow-up.Operation time and blood loss in group B(83.5±15.6min,226.4±28.5ml) were less than group A(93.5±13.4min,243.4±30.4ml) and group C(90.4±13.3min,237.4±25.5ml)(P〈0.05).The ratio of anterior vertebral height(48.6%±8.1%,47.3%±8.6%,47.9%±7.7%) and the Cobb angle(28.6°±4.2°,28.8°±5.7°,29.8°±4.5°) had no statistical significance preoperatively(P〉0.05),but which in group A(96.2%±3.2%,5.2°±1.2°) and group B(96.8%±3.5%,5.3°±1.1°) were better than group C(94.8%±4.3%,6.3°±1.8°) postoperatively.At the last follow-up,the ratio of anterior vertebral height and the Cobb angle in group A(97.1%±2.6%,5.7°±2.6°) were better than group B(93.7%±3.7%,6.8°±3.1°) and group C(94.2%±3.3%,29.8°±4.5°)(P〈0.05).The loss of ratio of anterior vertebral height and Cobb angle in the group A(2.1%±0.1%,1.2°±0.8°) and group C(2.3%±0.1%,1.4°±0.5°) were less than group B(5.1%±0.2%,3.7°±1.6°) at the follow-up,and the difference was statistical significance(P〈0.05).The VAS score had no statistical significance among the 3 groups at the final follow-up(P〉0.05).There was 1 case of broken screws in group B and 1 case of implant failure in group C,while there was no implant failure in group A.Conclusion:The surgery of fixation of fractured vertebra with calcium sulfate cement vertebroplasty is a safe and effective method for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture.It can restore the vertebral mechanical strength,achieve and maintain kyphosis correction,decrease the instrument failure rate and loss of vertebral height.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期561-565,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 胸腰椎爆裂骨折 硫酸钙 椎体成形术 短节段加伤椎固定 Thoracolumbar burst fracture Calcium sulfate cement Vertebroplasty Fixation of fractured vertebra
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load-sharing classifi- cation of spine fractures[J].Spine, 1994,19(15) : 1741-1744.
  • 2袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:306
  • 3Guven O,Kocaoglu B,Bezer M,et al. The use of screw at the fracture level in the treatment of thoraeolumbar burst fractures [J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(6) :417-421.
  • 4李晶,吕国华,王冰,卢畅,康意军,马泽民,邓幼文,陈飞,刘伟东.胸腰椎骨折脱位伤椎固定的可行性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(5):293-296. 被引量:230
  • 5张丙磊,赵东升,余枫,李爱民,殷军,赵玉麟.经骨折椎椎弓根螺钉固定在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(12):1078-1081. 被引量:4
  • 6Dick JC,Jones MP,Zdeblick TA,et al. A biomechanical comparison e- valuating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation[J].J Spinal Disord, 1994,7(5) :402-407.
  • 7Leferink VJ,Zimmerman KW,Veldhuis EF,et al. Thoracolumbar spinal fraetures:radiological results of transpedicular fixation combined with transpedicular cancellous bone graft and posterior fusion in 183 pa- tients[J].Eur Spine J,2001,10(6) :517-523.
  • 8Knop C,Fabian HF,Bastian L, et al. Late results of thoracolu-mbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone graft- ing[J],Spine ,2001,26( 1 ) :88-89.
  • 9Verlaan JJ,Dhert WJ, Verbout A J, et al. Balloon vertebroplasty in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation:a novel technique to treat thoracic and lumbar burst fractures [J].Spine,2005,30 (3):E73- E79.
  • 10Alanay A,Acaroglu E,Yazici M,et ah Short-segment pedicle instru- mentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures :does transpedicular intra- corporeal grafting prevent early failure[J]?Spine,2001,26(2):213-217.

二级参考文献27

  • 1李楠,张贵林,张波,公茂琪,王满宜.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松的椎体压缩性骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(7):828-831. 被引量:25
  • 2刘宏建,杜靖远,韩松辉,梁惠民,刘昌盛.经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2004,33(4):481-484. 被引量:10
  • 3李晶,吕国华,王冰,卢畅,康意军,马泽民,邓幼文,陈飞,刘伟东.胸腰椎骨折脱位伤椎固定的可行性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(5):293-296. 被引量:230
  • 4魏富鑫,刘少喻,赵卫东,于滨生,李浩淼,陈柏龄,梁春祥.胸腰椎爆裂性骨折伤椎固定的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(9):857-860. 被引量:44
  • 5Shen W J, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurelogic deficit. Spine, 2001, 26(9):1038- 1045.
  • 6Alvine GF, Swain JM, Asher MA, et al. Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with variable screw placement or isolai nstrumentation and arthrodesis: case series and literature review. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004, 17(4) :251 -264.
  • 7Mclain RF, Spading E, Benson DR. Early failure of short - segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures, A preliminaly report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) , 1993, 75(2) :162 -167.
  • 8Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD, et al. Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis evaluation of intraobserver interobserver and technique variability. Spine, 2001, 26( 1 ) :61 -66.
  • 9Dick JC, Jones MP, Zdeblick TA, et al. A biomechnical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate sscrews and cross - linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation. Spine Disord, 1994, 7 (5) :402 - 407.
  • 10郭世绂.骨科临床解剖学[M].济南:山东科技出版社,2000.329.

共引文献470

同被引文献123

引证文献15

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部