期刊文献+

激进的对称与“人的去中心化”——拉图尔的非人行动者能动性观念解读 被引量:6

Radical Symmetry and the Decentralization of Human:about Latour's Idea of the Agency of Nonhumans
原文传递
导出
摘要 拉图尔的行动者网络理论主张在人与非人之间保持激进的对称,认为二者都是科学活动中的行动者,享有完全对称的能动性。这种激进的对称性原则与拉图尔在科学研究中所追求的"人的去中心化"直接相关。从社会学角度看,人的去中心化很难实现,而且激进的对称很有可能导致科学实践的消解,因此,取消这种强对称性原则,代之以弱对称性原则,或许能够更好地理解科学。 In ANT, Latour insists radical symmetry between human and nonhumans. He thinks that both human and nonhumans are actors in scientific activities and they should share symmetrical agency. Radical symmetry concerns directly with the decentralization of human pursued by La'tour in science studies, which is very hard tO realize from the view of sociology. Furthermore, radical symmetry will possibly result in the disappearance of Science practice. Canceling this kind of strong symmetry and replacing it with weak asymmetry maybe will help us to understand science better.
作者 贺建芹
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期81-84,共4页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 非人 能动性 人的去中心化 强对称性 弱不对称性 nonhumans agency decentralization of human strong symmetry weak asymmetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1贺建芹.从科学知识的不同解释模式看科学知识社会学的发展[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,8(3):18-22. 被引量:3
  • 2[英]大卫·布鲁尔.知识与社会意象[M].艾彦译.北京:东方出版社,2001.
  • 3H M Collins. "Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism"[J].Social Studies of Science, Vol. 11, (1981) : 3-10.
  • 4M Lynch. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • 5S Woolgar. Sciente: the Very Idea[M]. London and New York: Tavistock Publications. 1988.
  • 6D Pels. The Politics of Symmetry[J]. Social Studies of Science,Vol. 26, No. 2, May, 1996.
  • 7A Pickering. The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science[J].The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 99, No. 3, November, 1993:559-589.
  • 8M Callon& B. Latour. Don't Throw the Baby out with the Bath Schooll [M]. in A. Pickering (ed.). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992 .
  • 9B Latour. We have never been Modern[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1993.
  • 10M P Jones, Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions[J].Sociological Theory, November, 1996,14 : 3.

二级参考文献4

共引文献7

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部