期刊文献+

佛掌山药与铁棍山药的营养成分比较 被引量:10

Comparison of the Nutritional Composition between Two Strains of Chinese yam Dioscore opposita
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]比较佛掌山药和铁棍山药主要营养成分,并对其营养价值进行评价。[方法]用常规方法测定佛掌山药和铁棒山药的干物质、矿物质、氨基酸、蛋白质、可溶性糖以及粗纤维含量。[结果]佛掌山药的干物质、磷和钾的含量分别比铁棍山药高7.0%、19.5%和26.0%,而铁棒山药铁、钙和锌的含量分别比佛掌山药高4.0%、7.8%和7.3%;佛掌山药的总氨基酸、必需氨基酸以及婴儿发育的必需氨基酸、蛋白质及可溶性糖的含量均高于铁棍山药,而粗纤维含量低于铁棍山药。[结论]佛掌山药的营养价值高于铁棍山药。 [Objective]The main nutritional composition between two strains of Chinese yam(Dioscore opposite),Buddha palm yam(BPY) and iron rod yam(IRY),was analyzed and compared,and their nutritional value was assessed.[Method] The content of dry matter,mineral,amino acids,protein,soluble sugar,crude fiber of BPY and IRY were determined by normal determination methods.[Result] The dry matter content in BPY was 7.0% higher than that in IRY.the contents of phosphorus and potassium in BPY were 19.5% and 26.0% higher than that in IRY.There were no significant differences in contents of iron,zinc and cadmium between the two strains,and was 4.0%,7.8% and 7.3%higher than BPY,respectively.Contents of total amino acids,required amino acids and required amino acids for baby development in BPY were significantly higher than that in IRY.Contents of protein and soluble sugar in BPY were higher than that in IRY,but crude fiber content in BPY was lower than that in IRY.[Conclusion] The nutritional value of BPY was higher than that of IRY.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第35期21678-21678,21703,共2页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 江汉大学2011年大学生科研实践项目
关键词 佛掌山药 铁棍山药 干物质 氨基酸 蛋白质 Buddha palm yam Iron rod yam Dry matter content Amino acid Protein
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献49

共引文献256

同被引文献157

引证文献10

二级引证文献113

;
使用帮助 返回顶部