期刊文献+

警告对共同目击者讨论后产生的错误记忆的影响 被引量:7

The Effects of warning on false memory resulting from co-witnesses discussion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用误导信息干扰范式,研究了事件后正确诱导与事件后误导对共同目击者的记忆准确性的影响。实验1,要求被试接受事件后诱导信息后进行线索化自由回忆,结果发现,目击者对事件后正确诱导信息项目的记忆准确性显著提高;对事件后误导信息项目的记忆准确性显著下降,产生了共同目击者误导信息效应。实验2,研究了警告对目击者记忆准确性的影响。在回忆前警告被试共同目击者提供的事件后信息不完全正确,请按照自己的记忆来完成线索化自由回忆,讨论无警告组与讨论警告组比较发现,警告并没有改变事件后误导信息效应,也没有改变目击者对正确诱导项目的记忆准确性,说明共同目击者讨论所产生的诱导效应很强烈,并且不容易改变。 Using misleading information paradigm, we explored the differential effects that the true and the false of oost-event iniormatlon on recalling Ior co-witness event, we analyzeu memory accuracy. In Study 1, participants received post-event, and then completed 20-item cued-recall questionnaire, the result was that, participants who received the true post-event information were more accuracy than no discussion; participants who received the false post-event.information were less accuracy than no discussion. In study 2, participants were warned that they have received the post-event information meight be wrong, so, they recalled the event based on themselves' memory. The result was that, warning didn't change the accuracy. The findings reported in the current experiment suggest that memory conformation may result from memory change and be not easily changed.
作者 曹海丽 张明
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2012年第2期88-91,共4页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 黑龙江省教育厅人文社科项目(12514013) 大庆师范学院青年基金研究项目(09SQ17)的资助
关键词 误导信息干扰范式 事件后诱导信息 共同目击者讨论 警告 misleading information paradigm, post-event information, co-witness discussion, warning.
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1郭秀艳,李荆广.误导信息干扰引发的错误记忆研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):814-819. 被引量:8
  • 2李宏英,连榕,翁洁.预警、重复学习和反馈对错误记忆的影响--错误记忆的信号检测论分析[J].心理科学,2008,31(6):1507-1509. 被引量:10
  • 3Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003) . Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543.
  • 4Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004) . Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9 (2) , 215-227.
  • 5Helen, M., & Richard, H. (2006) . Comparing Methods of Encountering Post-event Information: The Power of Co-witness Suggestion. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083-1099.
  • 6Johnson, K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
  • 7Loftus, E. F, & Palmer, J. (1974) . Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585--589.
  • 8Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2002) . Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory and Cognition, 30 (7) , 995-1009.
  • 9Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I (2006a) . Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eye-witness discussion. Psychology,, Crime & Law, Apr, 12 (2) , 181-191.
  • 10Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006b) . Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: the power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083-1099.

二级参考文献29

  • 1汪向东 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12..
  • 2M. B. Miller, G. L. Wolford. The role of criterion shift in false memory. Psychological Review, 1999,10 : 398 - 405
  • 3H.L. Roediger, K. B. McDermott. False Alarms About False Memories. Psychological Review , 1999, 106 (2) : 406 - 410
  • 4M. Singer, J.T. Wixted. Effect of delay on recognition decisions: Evidence for a criterion shift. Memory&Cognition, 2006,34 ( 1 ) : 125 - 137
  • 5J. G. Snodgrass, J. Corwin. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental. Psychology: General, 1988,177 : 34 - 50
  • 6Roediger, H. L. , III, Balota, D. A. , Watson, J. M. Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. The nature of remembering : Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2001, 95- 115
  • 7M. B. Brewer. A dual - process model of impression formation. In: Srull T K, Wyer R S ed. Advances in ~cial cognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum Press, 1988. 1 - 36
  • 8C. E. Westerberg, C. J. Marsler. Do Instructional Warnings Reduce False Recognition? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 20:97 - 114
  • 9A. S. Benjamin. On the Dual Effects of Repetition on False Recognition. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001, 27 ( 4 ): 941 - 947
  • 10M. F. Verde , C. M. Rotello. Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory , Memory & Cognition, 2005

共引文献15

同被引文献44

引证文献7

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部