期刊文献+

客观知识体系中语义关系的分析分类研究 被引量:7

Research on Analysis and Classification of Semantic Relations in Objective Knowledge System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语义关系能够准确地描述概念间的内在联系,是客观知识体系结构的重要组成部分,而对它的研究一直停留在隐性认知阶段。随着本体、语义Web和叙词表的语义化改造的深入研究和语义关系的不断丰富,需要对现有经典语义关系建立分类体系。本文首先定义了语义关系的概念,系统分析了语义关系的属性和性质,并依据前人的研究和语义关系自身的含义,通过定性分析建立了客观知识体系的经典语义关系的分类体系,最后与基于层次聚类所建立的关系分类树进行对比分析,验证了本文所建立的分类体系的合理性。这为语义关系识别、归类、组合研究奠定了基础。 Semantic relationship can accurately describe the intrinsic relationship between concepts and it is the important component of structure of objective knowledge system. While the research on semantic relations stays in recessive cognitive phase. Moreover, with further study on semanticization transformation of ontology, semantic web and thesaurus and increasing types of semantic relations, it has become more and more important to establish classification system of existing classical semantic relations. Therefore, this paper defines and analyzes concept and characteristics of semantic relation. Then through qualitative analysis, classification system of classical semantic relations in objective knowledge system is established based on previous studies and the meaning of semantic relations. Finally, rationality is proved with comparison of tree of semantic relations based on hierarchical clustering method of relation elements. All of that have laid a good foundation for the research on identification, classification and combination of semantic relations.
作者 裘江南 张彬
出处 《情报学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期259-267,共9页 Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金 国家自然科学基金项目
关键词 语义关系 分类 层次聚类算法 semantic relations, relation classification, hierarchical clustering algorithm
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Spellman B,Holyoak K,Morrison R.Analogical priming via semantic relations[J].Memory & Cognition,2001,29(3):383-393.
  • 2Storey V.Understanding Semantic Relationships[J].The VLDB Journal,1993,2(4):455-488.
  • 3Chaffin R,Herrmann D J.Relation element theory:a new account of the representation and processing of semantic relation[M]∥Gorfein D S,Hoffman R R.Memory and Learning:The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference.England:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1987:221-245.
  • 4Landis T,Herrmann D,Chaffin,R.Development differ-ences in the comprehension of semantic relations[J].Zeitschrift für Psychologie mit Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie,1987,195(2):129-139.
  • 5Winston M,Chaffin R,Hermann D.A taxonomy of part-whole relations[J].Cognitive Science,1987,11(2):417-444.
  • 6Brachman R.What IS-A is and isn′t:An analysis of taxonomic links in semantic networks[J].Computer,1983,16(10):30-36.
  • 7Schubert L,Papalaskaris M,Taugher J.Determining type,part,color,and time relationships[J].Computer,1983,16(10):53-60.
  • 8Rosario B,Hearst M.Classifying the semantic relations in noun compounds via a domain-specific lexical hierarchy[C]∥Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.PA:Association for Computational Linguistics,2001:82-90.
  • 9Stephens M,Palakal M,Mukhopadhyay S,et al.Detec-ting gene relations from midline abstracts[J].Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing,2001 (6):483-496.
  • 10裘江南,姚永祥,仲秋雁.XTM的主题相关度的量化机制研究[J].情报学报,2007,26(3):332-338. 被引量:5

二级参考文献40

  • 1徐德智,郑春卉,K. Passi.基于SUMO的概念语义相似度研究[J].计算机应用,2006,26(1):180-183. 被引量:56
  • 2邓三鸿,金莹,杨建林.学科知识地图的构建——以图书、情报学为例[J].情报学报,2006,25(1):3-8. 被引量:44
  • 3肖燕.信息揭示原理与方法[M].济南:山东大学出版社.1997:5.
  • 4ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005. Guidelines for the Construction, Format,and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies [S]. NISO Press,Bethesda,Maryland,U.S.A ,2005:45- 57.
  • 5马张华,侯汉清.文献分类法主题导论[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,1999:129-135.
  • 6F.W.Iancaster.情报检索词汇控制[M].侯汉清,戴维民,陆宝树译.上海:同济大学出版社.1992:17-25.
  • 7[13]SENSUS.http://www.isi.edu/natural-language/resources/sensus.html
  • 8[14]Mikrokmos.http://crl.nmsu.edu/Research/Projects/mikro/
  • 9[15]Guarino N.Semantic Matching:Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization,Extraction,and Integration.In:Pazienza M T,eds.Information Extraction:A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology,Springer Verlag,1997,139~170
  • 10[16]Perez A G,Benjamins V R.Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components:Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods.Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods:Lessons Learned and Future Trends (IJCAI99),de Agosto,Estocolmo,1999

共引文献780

同被引文献91

  • 1潘雨,王帅辉,张磊,胡谷雨,邹军华,王田丰,潘志松.复杂网络社团发现综述[J].计算机科学,2022,49(S02):208-218. 被引量:3
  • 2Shuang Yang,Yan Tang.News Topic Detection Based on Capsule Semantic Graph[J].Big Data Mining and Analytics,2022,5(2):98-109. 被引量:2
  • 3冯璐,冷伏海.共词分析方法理论进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2006,32(2):88-92. 被引量:572
  • 4赵丹群.信息检索中叙词表与Ontology的比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2006,29(6):738-741. 被引量:8
  • 5姜维,王晓龙,关毅,赵健.基于多知识源的中文词法分析系统[J].计算机学报,2007,30(1):137-145. 被引量:29
  • 6Allwood J,Andersson L,Dahl O. Logic in Linguistics[ M]. Britain : Cambridge University Press, 1977.
  • 7Chaffin R, Herrmann D. Similarity and Diversity of Sem- antic Relations [ J ]. Memory and Cognition, 1984,12 ( 1 ) : 134-141.
  • 8Chaffin R, Herrmann D. Relation element theory: a new account of the representation and Processing of Semantic Relation [ C]//Memory and Learning: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference. England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987:221-245.
  • 9Horrocks I, Gough G. Description Logics with Transitive Roles [ C ]//International workshop on Description Logics. French : Universite Paris-Sud, 1997.
  • 10Horrocks I, Sattler U. Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ (D) Description Logic [ C ]//Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence Presentation. San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Ine,2001 ( 1 ) :199-204.

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

;
使用帮助 返回顶部