期刊文献+

基于DINA模型的Q矩阵修正方法 被引量:40

A New Method of Q-matrix Validation Based on DINA Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究开发了一种基于DINA模型的认知诊断测验Q矩阵修正方法——γ法,为侦查并修正Q矩阵中的错误提供方法学支持,从而为保证Q矩阵的合理性提供基础,并为进一步提高认知诊断的准确率服务。本文采用MonteCarlo模拟及与国外同类研究相比较的方法进行,研究发现:(1)不论在何种作答失误概率(5%,10%,15%)情况下,当s,g临界值为0.2,0.25或0.3时,本研究提出的γ法均能有效地修正错误Q矩阵;同时,当Q矩阵无错误时,γ法对该Q矩阵未做任何修改。表明γ法对Q矩阵是否存在错误具有较强的识别能力及修正能力。(2)与国外同类研究相比,本研究提出的γ法具有较理想的修正率,且与delaTorre(2008)提出δ法的修正效果相当。但相比较而言,γ法较δ法更为简单。(3)γ法不仅能有效地修正错误的Q矩阵,而且还可以进一步提高认知诊断的正确率,尤其是对模式判准率(PMR),诊断正确率的最高增幅高达40%,大大改善了认知诊断的准确率。 Recently more and more attentions were paid on cognitive diagnosis (CD). The recognition of Q matrix was the basis and proposition of CD, and it was the only information media about cognitive attributes and test items. Only if it was recognized correctly, then the following cognitive analysis might be reliable. This paper developed a new modification method of Q matrix (called γmethod) based on DINA model. The method could detect and modify the mistakes on Q matrix that could make the Q matrix rationally and promote the correct match ratio of CD. Monte Carlo simulation method was use here, and some comparisons with western similar studies were done. Findings showed: (1) Under any response slip probability (5%, 10%, 15%) context, when the critical value of parameters s and g was set to be 0.2, 0.25 or 0.3, γmethod could modify the mistakes of Q matrix efficiently. When Q matrix was recognized correctly, no modification will be done by γmethod. These indicated that γmethod could work well on recognition and modification on Q matrix whether it has mistakes or not. (2) Compared to the similar western studies, the correct modification ratio of γmethod was relatively great and similar with the consequences of δmethod suggested by de la Tarre (2008). But γmethod was simpler than δ method. (3) The γmethod could not only rectify the mistakes of Q matrix efficiently but also promote the correct match ratio of CD. Especially the correct match ratio of PMR increased greater than 40% which was a wonderful work.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期558-568,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(31100756 31160203 30860084) 教育部人文社科项目(09YJCXLX012 11YJC190002) 高等院校博士点基金项目(20103604120001) 江西省教育厅高校人文社科项目(XL1011) 江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ10098) 江西师范大学青年英才培育资助计划
关键词 认知诊断 Q矩阵修正 DINA模型 cognitive diagnosis Q-matrix validation DINA model the ymethod
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1陈秋梅,张敏强.认知诊断模型发展及其应用方法述评[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(3):522-529. 被引量:29
  • 2Cheng,Y. Computerized adaptive testing:New developments and applications[D].University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,2008.
  • 3Cohen,J. A power primer[J].Psychological Bulletin,1992.155-159.
  • 4DeCarlo,L.T. On the analysis of fraction subtraction data:The DINA model,classification,latent class sizes,and the Q-matrix[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2010,(01):8-24.
  • 5de la Torre,J. An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model:Development and applications[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2008,(04):346-362.
  • 6de la Torre,J. DINA model and parameter estimation:A didactic[J].Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,2009.115-130.
  • 7de la Torre,J,Hong,Y,Deng,W.L. Factors affecting the item parameter estimation and classification accuracy of the DINA model[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2010,(02):227-249.
  • 8de la Torre,J,Douglas,J.A. Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis[J].Psychometrika,2004,(03):333-353.
  • 9Hartz,S. A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities:Blending theory with practicality[D].University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,2002.
  • 10胡竹菁.平均数差异显著性检验统计检验力和效果大小的估计原理与方法[J].心理学探新,2010,30(1):68-73. 被引量:49

二级参考文献79

共引文献178

同被引文献318

引证文献40

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部