期刊文献+

吗氯贝胺治疗抑郁症双盲对照和开放研究 被引量:1

A DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED AND OPEN TRIAL ON THE EFFICACY OF MOCLOBEMIDE IN TREATMENT OF DEPRESSIONS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨国产吗氯贝胺的抗抑郁疗效和安全性。方法 :以抗抑郁药阿米替林为对照 ,进行吗氯贝胺双盲对照和开放性研究。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表、汉密尔顿焦虑量表、临床大体印象量表、不良反应量表于治疗前、治疗后每周各评定 1次疗效和不良反应 ,并进行相应的体格检查 (包括卧、立位血压 )和化验室检查。结果 :全部入选病例 (抑郁症 99例 ,抑郁性神经症 47例 ,其中双盲对照各 30例 ,开放治疗 86例 )均完成了 4周临床试验 ,完成 6周和 8周试验的病例分别为 142和 12 8例。量表评分和临床评价均表明吗氯贝胺抗抑郁疗效肯定且见效快 ,研究组、对照组及开放组在治疗第 4,6 ,8周时的显效率分别是 46 .7% ,5 3.3 % ,46 .5 % ;86 .2 % ,88.9% ,75 .3% ;89.7% ,82 .6 % ,85 .3%。三组间无显著性差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。吗氯贝胺还显示出抗焦虑作用。吗氯贝胺的不良反应明显轻于阿米替林 ,对肝、肾功能和血压无明显影响。结论 OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of moclobemide.METHODS:Totally 146 patients were recruited into the study.30 were randomized to blind moclobemide group,30 to blind amitriptyline group,and 86 to moclobemide open group. After 4 weeks treatment the therapeutic effects were rated weekly by HDRS(Hamilton Depression Rating Scale),HARS(Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale),CGI(Clinical Global Impresssion),and TESS (Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale).RESULTS:The effective rate for blind moclobemide group,blind amitriptyline group,and open moclobemide group were 46.4%,53.3%,46.5%(4 weeks);86.2%,88.9%,75.3%(8 weeks);and 89.7%,82.6%,85.3%(8 weeks)respectively. No significant difference was observed between moclobemide and amitriptyline groups and fewer side effect with moclobemide group. CONCLUSION:The efficacy of domestic moclobemide has been confirmed by this study with mild and fewer side effects.
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 2000年第5期328-332,共5页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
关键词 吗氯贝胺 阿米替林 抑郁症 治疗 Moclobemide Amitriptyline Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献4

  • 1程文红,上海精神医学,1995年,新7卷,117页
  • 2程文红,上海精神医学,1995年,新7卷,89页
  • 3曾文琦,国外医学.精神病学分册,1995年,22卷,33页
  • 4曾文琦,赵靖平.抗抑郁新药吗氯贝胺[J]国外医学精神病学分册,1995(01).

共引文献185

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部